[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:16 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
On 09/02/2016 19:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Next question -- do we really need to redefine "inline" to
> always_inline at all, in C or C++? (cc'd a few people who might
> have an opinion). My instinct is to say "don't do this, just
> trust the compiler to decide whether to bother inlining".
Besides this, it sounds like a thing you'd do in the old -ffixed-reg days...
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/14] tests: Clean up includes, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/14] tests: Clean up includes, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/14] cris: Clean up includes, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/14] scripts/feature_to_c.sh: Include qemu/osdep.h rather than config.h, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Eric Blake, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Eric Blake, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Eric Blake, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Eric Blake, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Eric Blake, 2016/02/09
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] More #include cleanups, Peter Maydell, 2016/02/16