qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] s390x/cpu: Add functions to register CPU


From: Matthew Rosato
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] s390x/cpu: Add functions to register CPU state
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:22:21 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 02/18/2016 04:36 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:12:34 -0500
> Matthew Rosato <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Introduce s390_register_cpustate, which will set the
>> machine/cpu[n] link with the current CPU state.  Additionally,
>> maintain an array of state pointers indexed by CPU id for fast lookup
>> during interrupt handling.
>>
> cosmetic nit,
> you call qdev_get_machine() several time withing single function
> or when function already has machine argument. You probably shouldn't
> do it or do it once and use return value throughout function.
> 

Oops, will fix that.

>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  target-s390x/cpu.c     | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>  target-s390x/cpu.h     |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
>> index b3707f4..6a1e3f6 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
>> @@ -60,15 +60,35 @@
>>  #define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_MISSING    0x00
>>  #define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_PRESENT    0x01
>>  
>> -static S390CPU **ipi_states;
>> +static S390CPU **cpu_states;
>>  
>>  S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>  {
>> -    if (cpu_addr >= smp_cpus) {
>> +    if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
>>          return NULL;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    return ipi_states[cpu_addr];
>> +    /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
>> +    return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
>> +}
>> +
>> +int s390_register_cpustate(uint16_t cpu_addr, S390CPU *state)
> isn't it the board responsibility to link CPU somewhere?
> I'd suggest to use for it generic device hotplug hooks
> see how get_hotplug_handler() and pc_machine_device_plug_cb() are used,
> it's executed after CPU's realize is successfully completed.
> 

OK, I'll have a look at this.

>> +{
>> +    gchar *name;
>> +    int r = 0;
>> +
>> +    name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", cpu_addr);
>> +    if (object_property_get_link(qdev_get_machine(), name, NULL)) {
>> +        r = -EEXIST;
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    object_property_set_link(qdev_get_machine(), OBJECT(state), name,\
>> +                             &error_abort);
>> +
>> +out:
>> +    g_free(name);
>> +    return r;
>>  }
>>  
>>  void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
>> @@ -98,19 +118,26 @@ void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
>>  void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>>  {
>>      int i;
>> +    gchar *name;
>>  
>>      if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
>>          machine->cpu_model = "host";
>>      }
>>  
>> -    ipi_states = g_malloc(sizeof(S390CPU *) * smp_cpus);
>> -
>> -    for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
>> -        S390CPU *cpu;
>> +    cpu_states = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390CPU *) * max_cpus);
>>  
>> -        cpu = cpu_s390x_init(machine->cpu_model);
>> +    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
>> +        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
>> +        object_property_add_link(qdev_get_machine(), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
>> +                                 (Object **) &cpu_states[i],
>> +                                 object_property_allow_set_link,
>> +                                 OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
>> +                                 &error_abort);
>> +        g_free(name);
>> +    }
>>  
>> -        ipi_states[i] = cpu;
>> +    for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
>> +        cpu_s390x_init(machine->cpu_model);
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
>> index 5f6411f..620b2e3 100644
>> --- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>  #include "trace.h"
>>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>  #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
>> +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  #define CR0_RESET       0xE0UL
>> @@ -202,9 +203,20 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>>  
>>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>> +    if (s390_register_cpustate(next_cpu_id, cpu) < 0) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Cannot have more than %d CPUs", max_cpus);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>>      qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
>> -#endif
>> +    env->cpu_num = next_cpu_id;
>> +    while (next_cpu_id < max_cpus - 1) {
>> +        if (!cpu_exists(++next_cpu_id)) {
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
> maybe it's possible to reuse cpu_get_free_index() here?
> 

Hmm, but based on your other comment, there's no need to track
next_cpu_id in this fashion afterall.  To bring these 2 points together,
how about the following:

1) In Patch 4 (this patch), drop next_cpu_id.  Since we don't allow
unplug and only do sequential cpu adds, rely on env->cpu_num =
cs->cpu_index here in realizefn.

2) For hotplug in patch 5, check against QTAILQ_LAST(&cpus, CPUTailQ) as
you suggest.

I tried this out quick, seems to work fine.

Matt




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]