qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/2] tests/test-filter-mirror:add filter-mirr


From: Zhang Chen
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/2] tests/test-filter-mirror:add filter-mirror unit test
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:41:53 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1



On 02/23/2016 10:31 AM, Jason Wang wrote:

On 02/18/2016 04:10 PM, Zhang Chen wrote:
From: ZhangChen <address@hidden>

In this unit test we will test the mirror function.

start qemu with:
     -netdev socket,id=qtest-bn0,fd=%d
     -device e1000,netdev=qtest-bn0,id=qtest-e0
     -chardev socket,id=mirror0,path=/tmp/filter-mirror-test.sock,server,nowait
     -object filter-mirror,id=qtest-f0,netdev=qtest-bn0,queue=tx,outdev=mirror0

We inject packet to netdev socket id = qtest-bn0,
filter-mirror will copy and mirror the packet to mirror0.
we read packet from mirror0 and then compare to what we inject.

Signed-off-by: zhangchen <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <address@hidden>
---
  tests/.gitignore           |  1 +
  tests/Makefile             |  2 ++
  tests/test-filter-mirror.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tests/test-filter-mirror.c

diff --git a/tests/.gitignore b/tests/.gitignore
index 787c95c..10df017 100644
--- a/tests/.gitignore
+++ b/tests/.gitignore
@@ -63,5 +63,6 @@ test-write-threshold
  test-x86-cpuid
  test-xbzrle
  test-netfilter
+test-filter-mirror
  *-test
  qapi-schema/*.test.*
diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
index 650e654..e56c514 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile
+++ b/tests/Makefile
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_VHOST_NET_TEST_i386),)
  check-qtest-x86_64-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET_TEST_x86_64) += 
tests/vhost-user-test$(EXESUF)
  endif
  check-qtest-i386-y += tests/test-netfilter$(EXESUF)
+check-qtest-i386-y += tests/test-filter-mirror$(EXESUF)
  check-qtest-x86_64-y = $(check-qtest-i386-y)
  gcov-files-i386-y += i386-softmmu/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
  gcov-files-x86_64-y = $(subst 
i386-softmmu/,x86_64-softmmu/,$(gcov-files-i386-y))
@@ -563,6 +564,7 @@ tests/qemu-iotests/socket_scm_helper$(EXESUF): 
tests/qemu-iotests/socket_scm_hel
  tests/test-qemu-opts$(EXESUF): tests/test-qemu-opts.o $(test-util-obj-y)
  tests/test-write-threshold$(EXESUF): tests/test-write-threshold.o 
$(test-block-obj-y)
  tests/test-netfilter$(EXESUF): tests/test-netfilter.o $(qtest-obj-y)
+tests/test-filter-mirror$(EXESUF): tests/test-filter-mirror.o $(qtest-obj-y)
  tests/ivshmem-test$(EXESUF): tests/ivshmem-test.o 
contrib/ivshmem-server/ivshmem-server.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y)
  tests/vhost-user-bridge$(EXESUF): tests/vhost-user-bridge.o
diff --git a/tests/test-filter-mirror.c b/tests/test-filter-mirror.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c23135
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/test-filter-mirror.c
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/*
+ * QTest testcase for filter-mirror
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 FUJITSU LIMITED
+ * Author: Zhang chen <address@hidden>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
+ * later.  See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ */
+
+#include <glib.h>
+#include "libqtest.h"
+#include "qemu/iov.h"
+#include "qemu/sockets.h"
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
+
+static void test_mirror(void)
+{
+    int send_sock[2];
+    char *cmdline;
+    uint32_t ret = 0;
+    char send_buf[] = "Hello! filter-mirror~";
+    uint32_t size = sizeof(send_buf);
+    size = htonl(size);
+
+    ret = socketpair(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, send_sock);
+    g_assert_cmpint(ret, !=, -1);
socketpair does not exist on w32, let's exclude this from windows.

OK, I will fix~~

+
+    cmdline = g_strdup_printf("-netdev socket,id=qtest-bn0,fd=%d "
+                 "-device e1000,netdev=qtest-bn0,id=qtest-e0 "
+                 "-chardev 
socket,id=mirror0,path=/tmp/filter-mirror-test.sock,server,nowait "
+                 "-object 
filter-mirror,id=qtest-f0,netdev=qtest-bn0,queue=tx,outdev=mirror0 "
+                 , send_sock[1]);
+    qtest_start(cmdline);
+    g_free(cmdline);
+
+    if (fork() == 0) {
Don't get the point of why need a fork() here. I think you can just do
the test in one process, first inject the packet though sending socket
and then try to receive it.

I will fix it in next version.

+        int recv_sock;
+        uint32_t len = 0;
+        char *recv_buf;
+
+        recv_sock = unix_connect("/tmp/filter-mirror-test.sock", NULL);
Let's define /tmp/filter-mirror-test.sock as a macro.


OK~

+        if (recv_sock < 0) {
+            error_report("test_mirror connect filter-mirror-test.sock failed");
I was think maybe we can just pass the test here? Since we don't even
start the test.

yes, I will fix it in next version.

+            exit(1);
+        }
+        ret = qemu_recv(recv_sock, &len, sizeof(len), 0);
+        g_assert_cmpint(ret, ==, sizeof(len));
+        len = ntohl(len);
+
+        g_assert_cmpint(len, ==, sizeof(send_buf));
+        recv_buf = g_malloc0(len);
+        ret = qemu_recv(recv_sock, recv_buf, len, 0);
+        g_assert_cmpstr(recv_buf, ==, send_buf);
+
+        g_free(recv_buf);
+        close(recv_sock);
+        exit(0);
+    }
+
+    usleep(5000);
+    struct iovec iov[] = {
+        {
+            .iov_base = &size,
+            .iov_len = sizeof(size),
+        }, {
+            .iov_base = send_buf,
+            .iov_len = sizeof(send_buf),
+        },
+    };
+    ret = iov_send(send_sock[0], iov, 2, 0, sizeof(size) + sizeof(send_buf));
+    g_assert_cmpint(ret, ==, sizeof(send_buf) + sizeof(size));
+    close(send_sock[0]);
+
Should we unlink the socket file?

OK, I will fix.

+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
+
+    qtest_add_func("/netfilter/test-mirror", test_mirror);
We've already in the namespace of test, so probably no need for "test"
prefix here.

OK, I will fix it in next version.

Thanks
zhangchen


+    ret = g_test_run();
+    qtest_end();
+
+    return ret;
+}


.


--
Thanks
zhangchen






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]