[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] s390x/css: Allocate channel_subsys statical
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] s390x/css: Allocate channel_subsys statically |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:12:36 +0100 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:03:12 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:43:13PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:59:05 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > There's no need to use g_malloc0() to allocate the channel_subsys
> > > struct, just use a static variable.
> >
> > The original intention was to model that dynamically somehow, but I
> > don't see that happening anytime soon, so we can just keep it simple.
> >
> > >
> > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> > > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
> > > Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> > > Cc: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > hw/s390x/css.c | 177
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> >
> > Seems fine.
> >
> > Should this go through the s390x tree, or will it go through another
> > tree together with the other patches? In any case, have a
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
>
> Thanks!
>
> I was planning to merge it through the (to be created)
> machine-core tree. But it may take some days until I can do that,
> so feel free to merge patches 2-3 through the s390x tree if you
> want to.
>
Applied patches 2&3 to my s390-next branch (with some small
modifications on top of another change I have queued there).