qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/6] s390x/cpu: Add error handling to cpu cre


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/6] s390x/cpu: Add error handling to cpu creation
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:59:20 +0100

> Check for and propogate errors during s390 cpu creation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c     |  2 +-
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h     |  1 +
>  target-s390x/cpu-qom.h     |  3 +++
>  target-s390x/cpu.c         | 65 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  target-s390x/cpu.h         |  1 +
>  target-s390x/helper.c      | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  7 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index 3090e76..4886dbf 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,36 @@ void s390_memory_init(ram_addr_t mem_size)
>      s390_skeys_init();
>  }
> 
> +S390CPU *s390_new_cpu(MachineState *machine, int64_t id, Error **errp)

Just a thought, if not passing machine but the model string, we could make

cpu_s390x_init() call s390_new_cpu().

But then s390_new_cpu() would have to be moved again. Not sure if this is
really worth it.


David




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]