[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Performance Profiling 2 VMs
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Performance Profiling 2 VMs |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:15:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:32:30PM -0800, kalyan tata wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the quick reply Stefan
>
> Following from problem VM:
> 18:56:29 CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal
> %idle intr/s
>
> 18:56:44 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 100.20 0.00
> 18:56:49 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.21 10.22 0.00
> 79.56 908.22
> 18:56:54 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.47 54.93 0.00
> 2.82 5527.77
> 18:56:59 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.04 66.06 0.00
> 2.21 7160.64
> 18:57:04 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.42 65.13 0.00
> 2.00 7295.99
> 18:57:09 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.53 50.51 0.00
> 4.04 5700.20
> 18:57:14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.43 65.53 0.00
> 8.62 9572.34
> 18:57:19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.45 60.64 0.00
> 4.02 5798.19
> 18:57:24 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.45 81.33 0.00
> 0.80 6064.26
> 18:57:29 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.65 85.11 0.00
> 0.80 7578.27
> 18:57:34 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 84.17 0.00
> 1.40 9083.97
> 18:57:39 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.78 82.83 0.00
> 1.60 7264.87
> 18:57:44 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.62 87.78 0.00
> 0.60 8597.80
> 18:57:49 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.02 82.16 0.00
> 2.40 7750.90
> 18:57:54 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.42 81.76 0.00
> 1.00 6303.41
> 18:57:59 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.63 87.35 0.00
> 1.20 9422.49
> 18:58:04 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.44 80.32 0.00
> 2.21 7496.79
> 18:58:09 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.43 59.84 0.00
> 26.91 5019.28
> 18:58:14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 100.00 1.00
> 18:58:19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 100.00 0.00
>
> I set the affinity of both tx and rx interfaces to cpu 1 so just showing
> cpu1.
>
> NAPI weight is 128 in this version, I changed to 64 just to see. This
> version of the code seems to be changing quota and budget (which i did not
> see in newer versions) I am thinking of playing around with that.
> I also see that this version kicks for every packet on the tx side.
There is nothing surprising in the output. It makes sense for a
CPU-bound virtual networking workload.
Perhaps someone else has ideas.
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature