[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: RQFN rules, documentation

From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: RQFN rules, documentation
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0

On 04/04/16 17:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

>> ... My question is, do we need the "opt/" prefix at all (for the future,
>> i.e., the non-historical cases)?
>> Looking at the last discussion, I
>> believe we converged on:
>> - QEMU devs (future filenames): org.qemu/...
>> - users:                        com.my_company/...
>> - QEMU fw devs (future names):  org.tianocore.edk2.ovmf/...
>>                                 org.seabios/...
>> - QEMU fw devs hacking:         <root-prefix-to-strip>/...
>> Did you find something unsafe about this (necessitating "opt/")?
> The reason to use the opt/ prefix is to avoid warning
> with QEMU 2.4 and 2.5.

Sorry, it's been a long day :), and I don't understand your answer. Can
you please spell it out for me? How are QEMU 2.4 and 2.5 related to this


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]