qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] tcg/i386: Make direct jump patching threa


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] tcg/i386: Make direct jump patching thread-safe
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:55:50 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.0.92.6

Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden> writes:

> From: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
>
> Ensure direct jump patching in i386 is atomic by:
>  * naturally aligning a location of direct jump address;
>  * using atomic_read()/atomic_set() for code patching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
> ---
>  include/exec/exec-all.h   |  2 +-
>  tcg/i386/tcg-target.inc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/exec/exec-all.h b/include/exec/exec-all.h
> index 59709c9dd5c9..82399175fe80 100644
> --- a/include/exec/exec-all.h
> +++ b/include/exec/exec-all.h
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ void ppc_tb_set_jmp_target(uintptr_t jmp_addr, uintptr_t 
> addr);
>  static inline void tb_set_jmp_target1(uintptr_t jmp_addr, uintptr_t addr)
>  {
>      /* patch the branch destination */
> -    stl_le_p((void*)jmp_addr, addr - (jmp_addr + 4));
> +    atomic_set((int32_t *)jmp_addr, addr - (jmp_addr + 4));
>      /* no need to flush icache explicitly */
>  }
>  #elif defined(__s390x__)
> diff --git a/tcg/i386/tcg-target.inc.c b/tcg/i386/tcg-target.inc.c
> index 9187d34caf6d..3ffb7b3124d8 100644
> --- a/tcg/i386/tcg-target.inc.c
> +++ b/tcg/i386/tcg-target.inc.c
> @@ -1123,6 +1123,19 @@ static void tcg_out_jmp(TCGContext *s, tcg_insn_unit 
> *dest)
>      tcg_out_branch(s, 0, dest);
>  }
>
> +static void tcg_out_nopn(TCGContext *s, int n)
> +{
> +    static const uint8_t nop1[] = { 0x90 };
> +    static const uint8_t nop2[] = { 0x66, 0x90 };
> +    static const uint8_t nop3[] = { 0x8d, 0x76, 0x00 };
> +    static const uint8_t *const nopn[] = { nop1, nop2, nop3 };
> +    int i;
> +    assert(n <= ARRAY_SIZE(nopn));
> +    for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
> +        tcg_out8(s, nopn[n - 1][i]);
> +    }
> +}

*shudder* I recall x86 instruction encoding is weird. Maybe a comment
 for the function to describe the 3 forms of NOP we have here?

> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU)
>  /* helper signature: helper_ret_ld_mmu(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr,
>   *                                     int mmu_idx, uintptr_t ra)
> @@ -1777,6 +1790,10 @@ static inline void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode 
> opc,
>      case INDEX_op_goto_tb:
>          if (s->tb_jmp_offset) {
>              /* direct jump method */
> +            /* align jump displacement for atomic pathing */

s/pathing/patching/

> +            if (((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 3) != 3) {
> +                tcg_out_nopn(s, 3 - ((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 3));
> +            }

apropos my previous comments. I think the intention could be made
clearer the use of well named helper functions to check alignment and
calculate number elements until next alignment.

>              tcg_out8(s, OPC_JMP_long); /* jmp im */
>              s->tb_jmp_offset[args[0]] = tcg_current_code_size(s);
>              tcg_out32(s, 0);


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]