qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:36:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0

On 06/15/2016 09:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.06.2016 um 18:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
>> On 06/14/2016 10:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 14.06.2016 um 10:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
>>>>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, 
>>>>>> req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
>>>>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
>>>>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
>>>>>> #5  0x00007fa81c669ecb in bdrv_co_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, offset=8, 
>>>>>> bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
>>>>>>     flags=(BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ | BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE | 
>>>>>> BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING | BDRV_REQ_FUA | unknown: 
>>>>>> 4278124256), address@hidden(unknown: 0))
>>>>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1492
>>>>>
>>>>> That 'flags' value looks bogus...
>>>>>
>>>>>> #6  0x00007fa81c65e367 in blk_co_pwritev (blk=0x7fa81d4c5b60, 
>>>>>> offset=30878208, bytes=256, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
>>>>>>     flags=(unknown: 0)) at 
>>>>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:788
>>>>>> #7  0x00007fa81c65e49b in blk_aio_write_entry (opaque=0x7fa7e849aca0)
>>>>>>     at 
>>>>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:977
>>>>>> #8  0x00007fa81c6c823a in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, 
>>>>>> i1=<optimized out>)
>>>>>>     at 
>>>>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/util/coroutine-ucontext.c:78
>>>>>> #9  0x00007fa818ea8f00 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>>>>>
>>>>> and we don't get anything further in the backtrace beyond coroutines, to
>>>>> see who's sending the bad parameters.  I recently debugged a bogus flags
>>>>> in bdrv_aio_preadv, by hoisting an assert to occur before coroutines are
>>>>> used in blk_aio_prwv():
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg02948.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just posted v2 of that patch (now a 2/2 series), but in v2 no
>>>>> longer kept the assert at that point.  But maybe the correct fix, and/or
>>>>> the hack for catching the bug prior to coroutines, will help you debug
>>>>> where the bad arguments are coming from.
>>>>
>>>> That does not fix the assert.
>>>>  
>>>>>> #10 0x00007fa80d5189d0 in ?? ()
>>>>>> #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>>>>> (gdb) up 4
>>>>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, 
>>>>>> req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
>>>>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
>>>>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
>>>>>> 1243         assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
>>>>>> (gdb) p *qiov 
>>>>>> $1 = {iov = 0x7fa81da671d0, niov = 1, nalloc = 1, size = 256}
>>>>
>>>> So, it seems that the issue is coming from the fact that bdrv_co_pwritev()
>>>> does not handle alignments less than BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE :
>>>>
>>>>    /* TODO Lift BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE restriction in BlockDriver interface */
>>>>    uint64_t align = MAX(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, bs->request_alignment);
>>>>
>>>> It calls bdrv_aligned_pwritev() which does the assert : 
>>>>
>>>>    assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
>>>
>>> Yes, but between these two places, there is code that should actually
>>> enforce the right alignment:
>>>
>>>     if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
>>>         ...
>>>     }
>>>
>>> You can see in your backtrace that bdrv_aligned_pwritev() gets a
>>> different qiov than bdrv_co_pwritev() (which is local_qiov in the latter
>>> function).
>>>
>>> It's just unclear to me why this code extended bytes, but didn't add the
>>> tail_buf iovec to local_qiov.
>>
>> The gdb backtrace is bogus. It does not make sense. May be a gdb issue
>> with multithread on jessie.
>>
>> In the path tracking the tail bytes, we have : 
>>
>>      if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
>>      ...
>           if (!use_local_qiov) {
>               qemu_iovec_init(&local_qiov, qiov->niov + 1);
>               qemu_iovec_concat(&local_qiov, qiov, 0, qiov->size);
>               use_local_qiov = true;
>           }
>>         tail_bytes = (offset + bytes) & (align - 1);
>>         qemu_iovec_add(&local_qiov, tail_buf + tail_bytes, align - 
>> tail_bytes);
>>
>>         bytes = ROUND_UP(bytes, align);
>>     }
>>
>> This is where the issue is I think. The qiov holds 256 and bytes 512.
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix that though.
> 
> Added some more context above. qiov->size as passed from the device is
> already 256 bytes, which are added to local_qiov with
> qemu_iovec_concat(). And then we add another 256 from tail_buf in the
> lines that you quoted, so in theory we should end up with a properly
> aligned 256 + 256 = 512 byte qiov.

yes. 

It seems that qiov is bogus after the bdrv_aligned_preadv() call. It gets 
zeroed most of the time, sometime ->size is 1, and then qemu_iovec_concat()
constructs an awful local_qiov, which brings the assert in 
bdrv_aligned_pwritev()

How's that possible ? Could it be a serialization issue ? 

C.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]