[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] spapr: Support setting of compat CPU
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] spapr: Support setting of compat CPU type for CPU cores |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:05:14 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:53:49PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Compat CPU type is typically specified on -cpu cmdline option like:
> -cpu host,compat=power7 or -cpu POWER8E,compat=power7 etc.
> With the introduction of sPAPR CPU core devices, we need to support
> the same for core devices too.
>
> Support the specification of CPU compat type on device_add command for
> sPAPRCPUCore devices like:
> (qemu) device_add POWER8E-spapr-cpu-core,id=core3,compat=power7,core-id=24
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes in v1:
> - In the routine that extracts "compat=" from -cpu cmdline, made the parsing
> generic as suggested by Thomas Huth so that it works in the presence of
> any other additional features.
> - Addressed review comments by David with major one being setting of
> compat property directly instead of going via ->parse_features().
>
> TODO:
> - Reconcile with Igor's work that make cpu features as global properties.
> - Find a way to export the compat infomation via query-hotpluggable-cpus.
>
> v0: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg05279.html
>
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 8 +++++
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 78
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 778fa25..2049d7d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1807,6 +1807,7 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> if (i < spapr_cores) {
> char *type = spapr_get_cpu_core_type(machine->cpu_model);
> Object *core;
> + char *compat;
>
> if (!object_class_by_name(type)) {
> error_report("Unable to find sPAPR CPU Core definition");
> @@ -1818,6 +1819,13 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> &error_fatal);
> object_property_set_int(core, core_dt_id,
> CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
> &error_fatal);
> + compat = spapr_get_cpu_compat_type(machine->cpu_model);
> + if (compat) {
> + object_property_set_str(core, compat, "compat",
> + &error_fatal);
> + g_free(compat);
> + }
> +
> object_property_set_bool(core, true, "realized",
> &error_fatal);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 3a5da09..d500cd6 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,31 @@ char *spapr_get_cpu_core_type(const char *model)
> return core_type;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns the CPU compat type specified in -cpu @model.
> + */
> +char *spapr_get_cpu_compat_type(const char *model)
> +{
> + char *model_str = g_strdup(model);
> + char *featurestr, *compat = NULL;
> +
> + featurestr = model_str ? strtok(model_str, ",") : NULL;
AFAICT strtok() is not thread-safe.
> + while (featurestr) {
> + char *val;
> + if (!strncmp(featurestr, "compat=", 7)) {
> + val = strchr(featurestr, '=');
You don't technically need the strchr(), since from the strncmp above,
you know the answer will be featurestr + 6.
> + val++;
> + compat = g_strdup(val);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + featurestr = strtok(NULL, ",");
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + g_free(model_str);
> + return compat;
> +}
Couldn't we use one of the existing opts parsing functions in qemu for
the above, anyway?
> static void spapr_core_release(DeviceState *dev, void *opaque)
> {
> sPAPRCPUCore *sc = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> @@ -223,12 +248,31 @@ void spapr_core_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> DeviceState *dev,
> CPUCore *cc = CPU_CORE(dev);
> char *base_core_type = spapr_get_cpu_core_type(machine->cpu_model);
> const char *type = object_get_typename(OBJECT(dev));
> + char *base_compat_type = NULL;
> + char *compat = NULL;
> + bool compat_set;
>
> if (strcmp(base_core_type, type)) {
> error_setg(&local_err, "CPU core type should be %s", base_core_type);
> goto out;
> }
>
> + base_compat_type = spapr_get_cpu_compat_type(machine->cpu_model);
> + compat = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(dev), "compat", NULL);
> + compat_set = compat && *compat;
> +
> + if (base_compat_type) {
> + if ((compat_set && strcmp(base_compat_type, compat)) ||
> + !compat_set) {
> + error_setg(&local_err, "CPU compat type should be %s",
> + base_compat_type);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + } else if (compat_set) {
> + error_setg(&local_err, "CPU compat type shouldn't be set");
> + goto out;
I don't think we want this else clause, because it will forbid the use
of -global core_type,compat=whatever, which Igor says is the preferred
approach for the future (IIUC, using -global is equivalent to setting
the property explicitly on every instance).
The if clause should be ok, since it implements a fallback to using
-cpu, which we do want.
> + }
> +
> if (!smc->dr_cpu_enabled && dev->hotplugged) {
> error_setg(&local_err, "CPU hotplug not supported for this machine");
> goto out;
> @@ -256,6 +300,8 @@ void spapr_core_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> DeviceState *dev,
> }
>
> out:
> + g_free(compat);
> + g_free(base_compat_type);
> g_free(base_core_type);
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> }
> @@ -288,6 +334,8 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> Object *obj;
> int i;
> + char *compat = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(sc), "compat", NULL);
> + bool compat_set = compat && *compat;
>
> sc->threads = g_malloc0(size * cc->nr_threads);
> for (i = 0; i < cc->nr_threads; i++) {
> @@ -300,11 +348,18 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> if (local_err) {
> goto err;
> }
> + if (compat_set) {
> + object_property_set_str(obj, compat, "compat", &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> }
> object_child_foreach(OBJECT(dev), spapr_cpu_core_realize_child,
> &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> goto err;
> } else {
> + g_free(compat);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -315,9 +370,31 @@ err:
> i--;
> }
> g_free(sc->threads);
> + g_free(compat);
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> }
>
> +static char *spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_compat(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> +
> + return g_strdup(core->cpu_compat);
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_compat(Object *obj, const char *val,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> +
> + core->cpu_compat = g_strdup(val);
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_instance_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> + object_property_add_str(obj, "compat", spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_compat,
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_compat, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static void spapr_cpu_core_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> @@ -388,6 +465,7 @@ static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_info = {
> .parent = TYPE_CPU_CORE,
> .abstract = true,
> .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> + .instance_init = spapr_cpu_core_instance_init,
> .class_init = spapr_cpu_core_class_init,
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> index 1c9b319..e697dab 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> @@ -24,11 +24,13 @@ typedef struct sPAPRCPUCore {
> /*< public >*/
> void *threads;
> ObjectClass *cpu_class;
> + char *cpu_compat;
> } sPAPRCPUCore;
>
> void spapr_core_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp);
> char *spapr_get_cpu_core_type(const char *model);
> +char *spapr_get_cpu_compat_type(const char *model);
> void spapr_core_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp);
> void spapr_core_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature