qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/37] sd: free timer


From: Andrew Baumann
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/37] sd: free timer
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:53:46 +0000

> From: Marc-André Lureau [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2016 4:15
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Since you introduced the timer, could you review this patch?
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:54 PM
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/37] sd: free timer
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> From: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> 
> Free the timer allocated in instance_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index 87c6dc1..8e88e83 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -1876,6 +1876,14 @@ static void sd_instance_init(Object *obj)
>      sd->ocr_power_timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
> sd_ocr_powerup, sd);  }
> 
> +static void sd_instance_finalize(Object *obj) {
> +    SDState *sd = SD_CARD(obj);
> +
> +    timer_del(sd->ocr_power_timer);
> +    timer_free(sd->ocr_power_timer);
> +}
> +
>  static void sd_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)  {
>      SDState *sd = SD_CARD(dev);
> @@ -1927,6 +1935,7 @@ static const TypeInfo sd_info = {
>      .class_size = sizeof(SDCardClass),
>      .class_init = sd_class_init,
>      .instance_init = sd_instance_init,
> +    .instance_finalize = sd_instance_finalize,
>  };
> 
>  static void sd_register_types(void)

Thanks for the fix. This was based on some other timer code I found in the tree 
that was evidently also leaky (I don't remember where unfortunately).

One thing: are you sure it is safe to call timer_del() again if the timer may 
already have been deleted? It looks that way from the implementation, but the 
header comment isn't explicit.

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Baumann <address@hidden>

Cheers,
Andrew

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]