qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 00/18] pc: q35: x2APIC support in kvm_ap


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 00/18] pc: q35: x2APIC support in kvm_apic mode
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:24:29 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:18:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:33:17PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:41:23PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> > >> HI, everyone.
> > >> 
> > >> We have done some tests after merging this patch set into the lastest 
> > >> qemu
> > >> master. In kvm aspect, we use the lastest kvm linux-next branch. Here are
> > >> some problems we have met.
> > >> 
> > >> 1. We can't boot up a 288 vcpus linux guest with CLI:
> > >> qemu-system-x86_64 -boot c -m 4096 -sdl -monitor pty --enable-kvm \
> > >> -M kernel-irqchip=split -serial stdio -bios bios.bin -smp cpus=288 \
> > >> -hda vdisk.img -device intel-iommu,intremap=on -machine q35.
> > >> The problem exists, even after we only assign 32 vcpus to the linux 
> > >> guest.
> > >> Maybe the output "do_IRQ: 146.113 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)" is 
> > >> a clue.
> > >> The output of qemu and kernel is in attachments. Do you have any idea
> > >> about the problem and how to solve it?
> > >
> > >IIUC, we need to wait for Radim's QEMU patches to finally enable 288
> > >vcpus?
> > >
> > >Btw, could you please try adding this to the QEMU cmdline when testing
> > >with 32 vcpus:
> > >
> > >  -global ioapic.version=0x20
> > >
> > >I see that you were running RHEL 7.2 guest with a default e1000. In
> > >that case, we may need to boost ioapic version to 0x20.
> > 
> > It doesn't work. My host machine has 16 cpus. When I assign 4 or 8 vcpus to 
> > the guest
> > or 255 vcpus but set "kernel-irqchip=off", the guest work well. Maybe when 
> > irqchip
> > is in kernel, intremap can only handle situations that vcpus number is less 
> > than 
> > physical cpus'. Do you think it's right? 
> 
> I don't think so. Vcpu number should not be related to host cpu
> numbers.
> 
> I think the problem is with x2apic. Currently, x2apic is enabled in
> vIOMMU when kernel irqchip is used. This is problematic, since
> actually we are throughing away dest_id[31:8] without Radim's patches,
> meanwhile I see that by default x2apic is using cluster mode.
> 
> In cluster mode, 8 bits will possibly not suffice (I think the reason
> why >17 vcpus will bring trouble is that each cluster has 16 vcpus,
> we'll have trouble if we have more than one cluster).
> 
> To temporarily solve your issue, you should not only need "-global
> ioapic.version=0x20" in QEMU command line, but also add "x2apic_phys"
> to you guest kernel boot parameter, to force guest boot with x2apic
> physical mode (not cluster mode). Though this can only work for <255
> vcpus. IMHO we may still need to wait for Radim's patches to test >255
> case.

Not sure whether we should temporarily disable EIM by default for now
(provide an extra flag to optionally enable it)? Since it might break
guests with >17 vcpus.

CC Jan as well.

-- peterx



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]