[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pc: fix regression introduced by adding 2.8
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pc: fix regression introduced by adding 2.8 machine |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:03:12 +0200 |
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:18:46 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:19:09AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:01:49PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > commit (a4d3c834 pc: Add 2.8 machine) didn't ammend
> > > PC_COMPAT_2_6 to include PC_COMPAT_2_7 which results in
> > >
> > > {\
> > > .driver = "virtio-pci",\
> > > .property = "page-per-vq",\
> > > .value = "on",\
> > > },
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > {\
> > > .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > > .property = "l3-cache",\
> > > .value = "off",\
> > > },
> > >
> > > being ignored and as result change PC_COMPAT_2_6 behaviour.
> > >
> > [...]
> > > #define PC_COMPAT_2_6 \
> > > + PC_COMPAT_2_7 \
> > > HW_COMPAT_2_6 \
> > > {\
> > > .driver = "fw_cfg_io",\
> >
> > Isn't this supposed to be unnecessary since commit bacc344c
> > ("machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly")?
> >
> > --
> > Eduardo
>
>
> Indeed, I tested page-per-vq and it seems on for 2.6.
> Igor, Marcel, could you comment pls?
You are right, I think inconsistency in
#define PC_COMPAT_2_5 \
PC_COMPAT_2_6 \
HW_COMPAT_2_5
and
#define PC_COMPAT_2_7 \
PC_COMPAT_2_8 \
HW_COMPAT_2_7
made me think that we still need it.
I'd better clean-up PC_COMPAT_2_5 and PC_COMPAT_2_7
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] pc: fixes broken compat logic, Longpeng (Mike), 2016/09/17