qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [v19 0/4] AMD IOMMU


From: David Kiarie
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v19 0/4] AMD IOMMU
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:57:46 +0300

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On 20/09/2016 17:42, David Kiarie wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset adds basic AMD IOMMU emulation support to Qemu.
>>
>> Resent this with some changes suggested by Michael.
>
>
> Hi David,

Hi Paolo,

>
> please fix the problems below, that were reported by Coverity.

Thanks, will do ASAP.

>
> Paolo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363372:  Uninitialized variables  (UNINIT)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 147 in amdvi_generate_msi_interrupt()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 141        amdvi_writeq_raw(s, addr, amdvi_readq(s, addr) & val);
> 142     }
> 143
> 144     static void amdvi_generate_msi_interrupt(AMDVIState *s)
> 145     {
> 146         MSIMessage msg;
>>>>     CID 1363372:  Uninitialized variables  (UNINIT)
>>>>     Declaring variable "attrs" without initializer.
> 147         MemTxAttrs attrs;
> 148
> 149         attrs.requester_id = pci_requester_id(&s->pci.dev);
> 150
> 151         if (msi_enabled(&s->pci.dev)) {
> 152             msg = msi_get_message(&s->pci.dev, 0);
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363371:  Code maintainability issues  (SIZEOF_MISMATCH)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 337 in amdvi_update_iotlb()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 331
> 332     static void amdvi_update_iotlb(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
> 333                                    uint64_t gpa, IOMMUTLBEntry to_cache,
> 334                                    uint16_t domid)
> 335     {
> 336         AMDVIIOTLBEntry *entry = g_malloc(sizeof(*entry));
>>>>     CID 1363371:  Code maintainability issues  (SIZEOF_MISMATCH)
>>>>     Passing argument "8UL /* sizeof (key) */" to function "g_malloc" and 
>>>> then
>>>>     casting the return value to "uint64_t *" is suspicious.  In this 
>>>> particular case
>>>>     "sizeof (uint64_t *)" happens to be equal to "sizeof (uint64_t)", but 
>>>> this is
>>>>     not a portable assumption.
> 337         uint64_t *key = g_malloc(sizeof(key));
> 338         uint64_t gfn = gpa >> AMDVI_PAGE_SHIFT_4K;
> 339
> 340         /* don't cache erroneous translations */
> 341         if (to_cache.perm != IOMMU_NONE) {
> 342             trace_amdvi_cache_update(domid, PCI_BUS_NUM(devid), 
> PCI_SLOT(devid),
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363370:  Resource leaks  (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 356 in amdvi_update_iotlb()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 350             entry->perms = to_cache.perm;
> 351             entry->translated_addr = to_cache.translated_addr;
> 352             entry->page_mask = to_cache.addr_mask;
> 353             *key = gfn | ((uint64_t)(devid) << AMDVI_DEVID_SHIFT);
> 354             g_hash_table_replace(s->iotlb, key, entry);
> 355         }
>>>>     CID 1363370:  Resource leaks  (RESOURCE_LEAK)
>>>>     Variable "entry" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
> 356     }
> 357
> 358     static void amdvi_completion_wait(AMDVIState *s, uint64_t *cmd)
> 359     {
> 360         /* pad the last 3 bits */
> 361         hwaddr addr = cpu_to_le64(extract64(cmd[0], 3, 49)) << 3;
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363369:  Resource leaks  (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 356 in amdvi_update_iotlb()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 350             entry->perms = to_cache.perm;
> 351             entry->translated_addr = to_cache.translated_addr;
> 352             entry->page_mask = to_cache.addr_mask;
> 353             *key = gfn | ((uint64_t)(devid) << AMDVI_DEVID_SHIFT);
> 354             g_hash_table_replace(s->iotlb, key, entry);
> 355         }
>>>>     CID 1363369:  Resource leaks  (RESOURCE_LEAK)
>>>>     Variable "key" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
> 356     }
> 357
> 358     static void amdvi_completion_wait(AMDVIState *s, uint64_t *cmd)
> 359     {
> 360         /* pad the last 3 bits */
> 361         hwaddr addr = cpu_to_le64(extract64(cmd[0], 3, 49)) << 3;
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363364:    (CHECKED_RETURN)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 1150 in amdvi_realize()
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 1151 in amdvi_realize()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 1144         /* This device should take care of IOMMU PCI properties */
> 1145         x86_iommu->type = TYPE_AMD;
> 1146         qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(&s->pci), &bus->qbus);
> 1147         object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->pci), true, "realized", err);
> 1148         s->capab_offset = pci_add_capability(&s->pci.dev, 
> AMDVI_CAPAB_ID_SEC, 0,
> 1149                                              AMDVI_CAPAB_SIZE);
>>>>     CID 1363364:    (CHECKED_RETURN)
>>>>     Calling "pci_add_capability" without checking return value.
> 1150         pci_add_capability(&s->pci.dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI, 0, 
> AMDVI_CAPAB_REG_SIZE);
>>>>     CID 1363364:    (CHECKED_RETURN)
>>>>     Calling "pci_add_capability" without checking return value.
> 1151         pci_add_capability(&s->pci.dev, PCI_CAP_ID_HT, 0, 
> AMDVI_CAPAB_REG_SIZE);
> 1152
> 1153         /* set up MMIO */
> 1154         memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &mmio_mem_ops, s, 
> "amdvi-mmio",
> 1155                               AMDVI_MMIO_SIZE);
> 1156
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** CID 1363363:  Integer handling issues  (BAD_SHIFT)
> /hw/i386/amd_iommu.c: 188 in amdvi_setevent_bits()
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 182     }
> 183
> 184     static void amdvi_setevent_bits(uint64_t *buffer, uint64_t value, int 
> start,
> 185                                     int length)
> 186     {
> 187         int index = start / 64, bitpos = start % 64;
>>>>     CID 1363363:  Integer handling issues  (BAD_SHIFT)
>>>>     In expression "(1 << length) - 1 << bitpos", left shifting by more than
>>>>     31 bits has undefined behavior.  The shift amount, "bitpos", is as 
>>>> much as 63.
> 188         uint64_t mask = ((1 << length) - 1) << bitpos;
> 189         buffer[index] &= ~mask;
> 190         buffer[index] |= (value << bitpos) & mask;
> 191     }
> 192     /*
> 193      * AMDVi event structure



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]