[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] compiler: add ignore_value() macro
From: |
Felipe Franciosi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] compiler: add ignore_value() macro |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:20:07 +0000 |
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 19:15, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 09/21/2016 10:27 AM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>> On GCC versions 3.4 and newer, simply using (void) in front of a
>> function that has been declared with WUR will no longer suppress a
>> compilation warning. This commit brings the ignore_value() macro from
>> GNULIB's ignore_value.h, licensed under the terms of LGPLv2+.
>>
>> See the link below for the original author's comment:
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg05148.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> include/qemu/compiler.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
Hi Eric,
Now that the header and licensing of compiler.h got amended, can we look at
this again?
I think the right solution (at least for the moment) is to stick with my series
to fix the build.
1/2) We get the ignore_value() macro in.
2/2) We ignore the return value of that fwrite().
As I clarified on my last e-mail in this thread (21/sept), there are many other
calls around the replay code which could potentially fail and are all
unchecked. We could at least fix the build now and then talk about a separate
series to address those, if neccesary.
Thanks,
Felipe
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] compiler: add ignore_value() macro,
Felipe Franciosi <=