[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h im

From: Emilio G. Cota
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h improvements
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:10 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:59:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> See each patch.  My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> better example for future generations...

Just for context. Building on this patchset, is it now time to
phase out smp_(rw)mb in favour or C11's acq/rel, as you laid
out in your KVM Forum talk [*]?

What is the plan with smp_mb_(sg)et? It's not clear to me from
the slides, but given patch 5 I don't see a reason to keep them.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]