qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] acpi: cphp: support x2APIC entry in cp


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] acpi: cphp: support x2APIC entry in cpu._MAT
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:02:26 +0200

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:47:11 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:34:55 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:52:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
> > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > >  hw/acpi/cpu.c | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > index 902f5c9..5ac89fe 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -531,6 +531,11 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState 
> > > > *machine, CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
> > > >                  apic->flags = cpu_to_le32(1);
> > > >                  break;
> > > >              }
> > > > +            case ACPI_APIC_LOCAL_X2APIC: {
> > > > +                AcpiMadtProcessorX2Apic *apic = (void *)madt_buf->data;
> > > > +                apic->flags = cpu_to_le32(1);
> > > > +                break;
> > > > +            }    
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't this patch be applied before 01/13 to avoid triggering
> > > the assert() below?  
> > There is no AcpiMadtProcessorX2Apic before 1/13,
> > 
> > how about squashing this patch into 1/13, that should be cleaner.  
> 
> It would work, too. I assume you will squash it on v4 of 01/13.
> 

yep



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]