Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 18.10.2016 um 11:36 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 19:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> > On 28.09.2016 22:46, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > 162 is potentially racy and makes some invalid assumptions about what
> > > should happen when connecting to a non-existing domain name. This series
> > > fixes both issues.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > v4:
> > > - Added documentation for the new --fork option [Kevin]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > git-backport-diff against v3:
> > > 
> > > Key:
> > > [----] : patches are identical
> > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream
> > > patch
> > > [down] : patch is downstream-only
> > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences,
> > > respectively
> > > 
> > > 001/3:[0004] [FC] 'qemu-nbd: Add --fork option'
> > > 002/3:[----] [--] 'iotests: Remove raciness from 162'
> > > 003/3:[----] [--] 'iotests: Do not rely on unavailable domains in 162'
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Max Reitz (3):
> > >   qemu-nbd: Add --fork option
> > >   iotests: Remove raciness from 162
> > >   iotests: Do not rely on unavailable domains in 162
> > > 
> > >  qemu-nbd.c                 | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > >  qemu-nbd.texi              |  2 ++
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/162     | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/162.out |  2 +-
> > >  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Ping
> 
> I expected that Sascha would review this as he had comments on earlier
> versions?

Apparently that's not happening, so I've applied the series now.

Kevin

pgpFkvIqBBsai.pgp
Description: PGP signature