[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 10/22] vfio iommu type1: Add support for med
|
From: |
Alex Williamson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 10/22] vfio iommu type1: Add support for mediated devices |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:54:24 -0700 |
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:59:53 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
> Mediated device only uses IOMMU APIs, the underlying hardware can be
> managed by an IOMMU domain.
>
> Aim of this change is:
> - To use most of the code of TYPE1 IOMMU driver for mediated devices
> - To support direct assigned device and mediated device in single module
>
> This change adds pin and unpin support for mediated device to TYPE1 IOMMU
> backend module. More details:
> - Domain for external user is tracked separately in vfio_iommu structure.
> It is allocated when group for first mdev device is attached.
> - Pages pinned for external domain are tracked in each vfio_dma structure
> for that iova range.
> - Page tracking rb-tree in vfio_dma keeps <iova, pfn, ref_count>. Key of
> rb-tree is iova, but it actually aims to track pfns.
> - On external pin request for an iova, page is pinned once, if iova is
> already pinned and tracked, ref_count is incremented.
> - External unpin request unpins pages only when ref_count is 0.
> - Pinned pages list is used to verify unpinning request and to unpin
> remaining pages while detaching the group for that device.
> - Page accounting is updated to account in its address space where the
> pages are pinned/unpinned, i.e dma->task
> - Accouting for mdev device is only done if there is no iommu capable
> domain in the container. When there is a direct device assigned to the
> container and that domain is iommu capable, all pages are already pinned
> during DMA_MAP.
> - Page accouting is updated on hot plug and unplug mdev device and pass
> through device.
>
> Tested by assigning below combinations of devices to a single VM:
> - GPU pass through only
> - vGPU device only
> - One GPU pass through and one vGPU device
> - Linux VM hot plug and unplug vGPU device while GPU pass through device
> exist
> - Linux VM hot plug and unplug GPU pass through device while vGPU device
> exist
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <address@hidden>
> Change-Id: I295d6f0f2e0579b8d9882bfd8fd5a4194b97bd9a
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 598
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 536 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 50aca95cf61e..0de7c20f66b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> #include <linux/vfio.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/mdev.h>
>
> #define DRIVER_VERSION "0.2"
> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Alex Williamson <address@hidden>"
> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_hugepages,
>
> struct vfio_iommu {
> struct list_head domain_list;
> + struct vfio_domain *external_domain; /* domain for external user */
> struct mutex lock;
> struct rb_root dma_list;
> bool v2;
> @@ -76,7 +78,9 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> unsigned long vaddr; /* Process virtual addr */
> size_t size; /* Map size (bytes) */
> int prot; /* IOMMU_READ/WRITE */
> + bool iommu_mapped;
> struct task_struct *task;
> + struct rb_root pfn_list; /* Ex-user pinned pfn list */
> };
>
> struct vfio_group {
> @@ -85,6 +89,21 @@ struct vfio_group {
> };
>
> /*
> + * Guest RAM pinning working set or DMA target
> + */
> +struct vfio_pfn {
> + struct rb_node node;
> + dma_addr_t iova; /* Device address */
> + unsigned long pfn; /* Host pfn */
> + atomic_t ref_count;
> +};
> +
> +#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \
> + (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> +
> +static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
> +
> +/*
> * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data buffers
> * into DMA'ble space using the IOMMU
> */
> @@ -132,6 +151,97 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *old)
> rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Helper Functions for host iova-pfn list
> + */
> +static struct vfio_pfn *vfio_find_vpfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> + struct rb_node *node = dma->pfn_list.rb_node;
> +
> + while (node) {
> + vpfn = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_pfn, node);
> +
> + if (iova < vpfn->iova)
> + node = node->rb_left;
> + else if (iova > vpfn->iova)
> + node = node->rb_right;
> + else
> + return vpfn;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_link_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> + struct vfio_pfn *new)
> +{
> + struct rb_node **link, *parent = NULL;
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> + link = &dma->pfn_list.rb_node;
> + while (*link) {
> + parent = *link;
> + vpfn = rb_entry(parent, struct vfio_pfn, node);
> +
> + if (new->iova < vpfn->iova)
> + link = &(*link)->rb_left;
> + else
> + link = &(*link)->rb_right;
> + }
> +
> + rb_link_node(&new->node, parent, link);
> + rb_insert_color(&new->node, &dma->pfn_list);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_unlink_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, struct vfio_pfn *old)
> +{
> + rb_erase(&old->node, &dma->pfn_list);
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_add_to_pfn_list(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> + unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> + vpfn = kzalloc(sizeof(*vpfn), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vpfn)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + vpfn->iova = iova;
> + vpfn->pfn = pfn;
> + atomic_set(&vpfn->ref_count, 1);
> + vfio_link_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_remove_from_pfn_list(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn)
> +{
> + vfio_unlink_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> + kfree(vpfn);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vfio_pfn *vfio_iova_get_vfio_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> + unsigned long iova)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +
> + if (vpfn)
> + atomic_inc(&vpfn->ref_count);
> + return vpfn;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, struct vfio_pfn
> *vpfn)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&vpfn->ref_count)) {
> + ret = put_pfn(vpfn->pfn, dma->prot);
> + vfio_remove_from_pfn_list(dma, vpfn);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> struct vwork {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> long npage;
> @@ -270,7 +380,6 @@ static int vaddr_get_pfn(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
> long vaddr,
> }
>
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> -
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -280,28 +389,36 @@ static int vaddr_get_pfn(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
> long vaddr,
> * first page and all consecutive pages with the same locking.
> */
> static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> - long npage, int prot, unsigned long *pfn_base)
> + long npage, unsigned long *pfn_base)
> {
> unsigned long limit;
> bool lock_cap = ns_capable(task_active_pid_ns(dma->task)->user_ns,
> CAP_IPC_LOCK);
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> - long ret, i;
> + long ret, i, lock_acct = 0;
> bool rsvd;
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
nit, we only ever check whether it exists, we don't need a variable for
that.
> + dma_addr_t iova = vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;
>
> mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
> if (!mm)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, prot, pfn_base);
> + ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
> if (ret)
> goto pin_pg_remote_exit;
>
> rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
> + if (!rsvd) {
> + vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> + if (!vpfn)
> + lock_acct = 1;
> + }
> +
> limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> - put_pfn(*pfn_base, prot);
> + if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + lock_acct > limit) {
> + put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n", __func__,
> limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -310,35 +427,43 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> unsigned long vaddr,
>
> if (unlikely(disable_hugepages)) {
> if (!rsvd)
> - vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1);
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, lock_acct);
nit, if we only update lock_acct for !rsvd pages, we don't need to test
(!rsvd).
> ret = 1;
> goto pin_pg_remote_exit;
> }
>
> /* Lock all the consecutive pages from pfn_base */
> - for (i = 1, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE; i < npage; i++, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 1, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE, iova += PAGE_SIZE; i < npage;
> + i++, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE, iova += PAGE_SIZE) {
> unsigned long pfn = 0;
>
> - ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, prot, &pfn);
> + ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, &pfn);
> if (ret)
> break;
>
> if (pfn != *pfn_base + i ||
> rsvd != is_invalid_reserved_pfn(pfn)) {
> - put_pfn(pfn, prot);
> + put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + i + 1 > limit) {
> - put_pfn(pfn, prot);
> + if (!rsvd && !lock_cap &&
> + mm->locked_vm + lock_acct + 1 > limit) {
This is still wrong, if the page is already in pfn_list and we're at
the locked memory limit, we unnecessarily error here. We need to know
whether or not we're accounting it before we can do this test.
> + put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
> __func__, limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (!rsvd) {
> + vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> + if (!vpfn)
> + lock_acct++;
> + }
> }
>
> if (!rsvd)
> - vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, i);
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, lock_acct);
> ret = i;
>
> pin_pg_remote_exit:
See attached for my attempt (untested) to fix this, and the nits noted
below
> @@ -346,14 +471,79 @@ pin_pg_remote_exit:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long pfn,
> - long npage, int prot, bool do_accounting)
> +static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> + unsigned long pfn, long npage,
> + bool do_accounting)
> {
> - unsigned long unlocked = 0;
> + long unlocked = 0, locked = 0;
> long i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < npage; i++)
> - unlocked += put_pfn(pfn++, prot);
> + for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> + if (put_pfn(pfn++, dma->prot)) {
> + unlocked++;
> + vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova + (i << PAGE_SHIFT));
> + if (vpfn)
We don't need vpfn:
if (vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova + (i << PAGE_SHIFT)))
locked++;
> + locked++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (do_accounting)
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, locked - unlocked);
> +
> + return unlocked;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> + unsigned long *pfn_base, bool do_accounting)
> +{
> + unsigned long limit;
> + bool lock_cap = ns_capable(task_active_pid_ns(dma->task)->user_ns,
> + CAP_IPC_LOCK);
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + int ret;
> + bool rsvd;
> +
> + mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
> + if (!mm)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
> + if (ret)
> + goto pin_page_exit;
> +
> + rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
> + limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> + put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> + pr_warn("%s: Task %s (%d) RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
> + __func__, dma->task->comm, task_pid_nr(dma->task),
> + limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto pin_page_exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (!rsvd && do_accounting)
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1);
> + ret = 1;
> +
> +pin_page_exit:
> + mmput(mm);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_unpin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> + bool do_accounting)
> +{
> + int unlocked;
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +
> + if (!vpfn)
> + return 0;
> +
> + unlocked = vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(dma, vpfn);
>
> if (do_accounting)
> vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> @@ -361,14 +551,145 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma
> *dma, unsigned long pfn,
> return unlocked;
> }
>
> -static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
> + unsigned long *user_pfn,
> + int npage, int prot,
> + unsigned long *phys_pfn)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> + int i, j, ret;
> + unsigned long remote_vaddr;
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> + bool do_accounting;
> +
> + if (!iommu || !user_pfn || !phys_pfn)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Supported for v2 version only */
> + if (!iommu->v2)
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> + if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto pin_done;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If iommu capable domain exist in the container then all pages are
> + * already pinned and accounted. Accouting should be done if there is no
> + * iommu capable domain in the container.
> + */
> + do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> + dma_addr_t iova;
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> + iova = user_pfn[i] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> + if (!dma) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto pin_unwind;
> + }
> +
> + if ((dma->prot & prot) != prot) {
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + goto pin_unwind;
> + }
> +
> + vpfn = vfio_iova_get_vfio_pfn(dma, iova);
> + if (vpfn) {
> + phys_pfn[i] = vpfn->pfn;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + remote_vaddr = dma->vaddr + iova - dma->iova;
> + ret = vfio_pin_page_external(dma, remote_vaddr, &phys_pfn[i],
> + do_accounting);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + WARN_ON(!ret);
> + goto pin_unwind;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vfio_add_to_pfn_list(dma, iova, phys_pfn[i]);
> + if (ret) {
> + vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> + goto pin_unwind;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = i;
> + goto pin_done;
> +
> +pin_unwind:
> + phys_pfn[i] = 0;
> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> + dma_addr_t iova;
> +
> + iova = user_pfn[j] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> + vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> + phys_pfn[j] = 0;
> + }
> +pin_done:
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
> + unsigned long *user_pfn,
> + int npage)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> + bool do_accounting;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!iommu || !user_pfn)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Supported for v2 version only */
> + if (!iommu->v2)
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> + if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> + for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> + dma_addr_t iova;
> +
> + iova = user_pfn[i] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> + if (!dma)
> + goto unpin_exit;
> + vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> + }
> +
> +unpin_exit:
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return i > npage ? npage : (i > 0 ? i : -EINVAL);
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
> + bool do_accounting)
> {
> dma_addr_t iova = dma->iova, end = dma->iova + dma->size;
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> long unlocked = 0;
>
> if (!dma->size)
> - return;
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> * We use the IOMMU to track the physical addresses, otherwise we'd
> * need a much more complicated tracking system. Unfortunately that
> @@ -410,20 +731,26 @@ static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *dma)
> if (WARN_ON(!unmapped))
> break;
>
> - unlocked += vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + unlocked += vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, iova,
> + phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> unmapped >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> - dma->prot, false);
> + false);
> iova += unmapped;
>
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> - vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> + dma->iommu_mapped = false;
> + if (do_accounting) {
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return unlocked;
> }
>
> static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> {
> - vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma);
> + vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
> vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
> put_task_struct(dma->task);
> kfree(dma);
> @@ -606,8 +933,7 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *dma,
> while (size) {
> /* Pin a contiguous chunk of memory */
> npage = vfio_pin_pages_remote(dma, vaddr + dma->size,
> - size >> PAGE_SHIFT, dma->prot,
> - &pfn);
> + size >> PAGE_SHIFT, &pfn);
> if (npage <= 0) {
> WARN_ON(!npage);
> ret = (int)npage;
> @@ -618,8 +944,8 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *dma,
> ret = vfio_iommu_map(iommu, iova + dma->size, pfn, npage,
> dma->prot);
> if (ret) {
> - vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, pfn, npage,
> - dma->prot, true);
> + vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, iova + dma->size, pfn,
> + npage, true);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -627,6 +953,8 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *dma,
> dma->size += npage << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> + dma->iommu_mapped = true;
> +
> if (ret)
> vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>
> @@ -682,11 +1010,16 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> dma->prot = prot;
> get_task_struct(current);
> dma->task = current;
> + dma->pfn_list = RB_ROOT;
>
> /* Insert zero-sized and grow as we map chunks of it */
> vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
>
> - ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
> + /* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
> + if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> + dma->size = size;
> + else
> + ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
> do_map_err:
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> return ret;
> @@ -715,10 +1048,6 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> d = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list, struct vfio_domain, next);
> n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
>
> - /* If there's not a domain, there better not be any mappings */
> - if (WARN_ON(n && !d))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> struct vfio_dma *dma;
> dma_addr_t iova;
> @@ -727,21 +1056,49 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> iova = dma->iova;
>
> while (iova < dma->iova + dma->size) {
> - phys_addr_t phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> + phys_addr_t phys;
> size_t size;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> - iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> - continue;
> + if (dma->iommu_mapped) {
> + phys_addr_t p;
> + dma_addr_t i;
> +
> + phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> + iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + p = phys + size;
> + i = iova + size;
> + while (i < dma->iova + dma->size &&
> + p == iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, i)) {
> + size += PAGE_SIZE;
> + p += PAGE_SIZE;
> + i += PAGE_SIZE;
> + }
> + } else {
> + unsigned long pfn;
> + unsigned long vaddr = dma->vaddr +
> + (iova - dma->iova);
> + size_t n = dma->iova + dma->size - iova;
> + long npage;
> +
> + npage = vfio_pin_pages_remote(dma, vaddr,
> + n >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + &pfn);
> + if (npage <= 0) {
> + WARN_ON(!npage);
> + ret = (int)npage;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + phys = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + size = npage << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> - size = PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> - while (iova + size < dma->iova + dma->size &&
> - phys + size == iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain,
> - iova + size))
> - size += PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> ret = iommu_map(domain->domain, iova, phys,
> size, dma->prot | domain->prot);
> if (ret)
> @@ -749,8 +1106,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>
> iova += size;
> }
> + dma->iommu_mapped = true;
> }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -806,7 +1163,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> struct vfio_group *group;
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> - struct bus_type *bus = NULL;
> + struct bus_type *bus = NULL, *mdev_bus;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> @@ -818,6 +1175,13 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
> }
> }
>
> + if (iommu->external_domain) {
> + if (find_iommu_group(iommu->external_domain, iommu_group)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!group || !domain) {
> @@ -832,6 +1196,25 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
> if (ret)
> goto out_free;
>
> + mdev_bus = symbol_get(mdev_bus_type);
> +
> + if (mdev_bus) {
> + if ((bus == mdev_bus) && !iommu_present(bus)) {
> + symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> + if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> + iommu->external_domain = domain;
> + } else
> + kfree(domain);
> +
> + list_add(&group->next,
> + &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> + }
> +
> domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(bus);
> if (!domain->domain) {
> ret = -EIO;
> @@ -922,6 +1305,54 @@ static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu)
> vfio_remove_dma(iommu, rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node));
> }
>
> +static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *n, *p;
> +
> + n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> + long locked = 0, unlocked = 0;
> +
> + dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> + unlocked += vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, false);
> + p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list);
> + for (; p; p = rb_next(p)) {
> + bool rsvd;
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct vfio_pfn,
> + node);
> +
> + rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(vpfn->pfn);
> + if (!rsvd)
We don't need to save rsvd:
if (!is_invalid_reserved_pfn(vpfn->pfn))
locked++;
> + locked++;
> + }
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, locked - unlocked);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_external_unpin_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + bool do_accounting)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *n, *p;
> +
> + n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> + int unlocked = 0;
> +
> + dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> + while ((p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list))) {
> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct vfio_pfn,
> + node);
> +
> + unlocked += vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> + }
> +
> + if (do_accounting)
> + vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> {
> @@ -931,6 +1362,26 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> + if (iommu->external_domain) {
> + domain = iommu->external_domain;
Using the domain variable here actually makes this more difficult to
follow.
> + group = find_iommu_group(domain, iommu_group);
> + if (group) {
> + list_del(&group->next);
> + kfree(group);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
For example here we need to look back and see that domain is
iommu->external_domain.
> + if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
> + vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, true);
> + vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> + } else
> + vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, false);
> + kfree(domain);
> + iommu->external_domain = NULL;
And here, if we called kfree(iommu->external_domain), then set it to
NULL it's a little more cohesive.
> + }
> + goto detach_group_done;
> + }
> + }
> +
I almost wrote a big comment here about how we should be invalidating
the vendor drivers mappings via the notifier in the next patch rather
than clearing them ourselves here, but in the case where the group list
is empty, I think you're correct that we know through the way vfio
works that the device has been released and by that, the vendor driver
should be well informed that its mappings are invalid.
However, it seems that this invites sloppy behavior from the vendor
driver. Take for instance the !list_empty case. This would imply that
we have multiple mdev devices, potentially each with pinned pages. If
the vendor driver does not unpin their pages on device release, then
we're going to be left with a non-empty pfn_list when the user does an
unmap of that range, which will hit the WARN_ON that I encouraged you to
add. A warning/bug is still correct in that case, but I wonder if
we're going to hit that more than we'd like due to poorly behaved
vendor drivers and how we might make the code more robust to prevent
that.
If we say that a vendor driver MUST unpin all mappings when the device
is released, shouldn't that happen before we get here, so perhaps we
can WARN_ON if there are actually any external mappings to unpin here?
We may not be able to figure out which vendor driver is broken when
there are multiple devices, but it should break in the same way when
there's only one and it should show up in casual testing that way.
I don't think I'd call this a gating issue to taking this series, but
I'd like to address it as a follow-on before we get through the rc
cycle.
> list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> group = find_iommu_group(domain, iommu_group);
> if (!group)
> @@ -940,21 +1391,27 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
> list_del(&group->next);
> kfree(group);
> /*
> - * Group ownership provides privilege, if the group
> - * list is empty, the domain goes away. If it's the
> - * last domain, then all the mappings go away too.
> + * Group ownership provides privilege, if the group list is
> + * empty, the domain goes away. If it's the last domain with
> + * iommu and external domain doesn't exist, then all the
> + * mappings go away too. If it's the last domain with iommu and
> + * external domain exist, update accounting
> */
> if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
> - if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list))
> - vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> + if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list)) {
> + if (!iommu->external_domain)
> + vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> + else
> + vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(iommu);
> + }
> iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> list_del(&domain->next);
> kfree(domain);
> }
> - goto done;
> + break;
> }
>
> -done:
> +detach_group_done:
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> }
>
> @@ -986,27 +1443,42 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> return iommu;
> }
>
> +static void vfio_release_domain(struct vfio_domain *domain, bool external)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *group, *group_tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
> + &domain->group_list, next) {
> + if (!external)
> + iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> + list_del(&group->next);
> + kfree(group);
> + }
> +
> + if (!external)
> + iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> +}
> +
> static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *domain_tmp;
> - struct vfio_group *group, *group_tmp;
> +
> + if (iommu->external_domain) {
> + vfio_release_domain(iommu->external_domain, true);
> + vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, false);
> + kfree(iommu->external_domain);
> + iommu->external_domain = NULL;
> + }
Same as above, it seems like something is broken in the vendor driver
if we get here and still have anything pinned. We should be screaming
about that since it's our only mechanism to make sure the vendor driver
unpins pages on device release.
>
> vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(domain, domain_tmp,
> &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
> - &domain->group_list, next) {
> - iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> - list_del(&group->next);
> - kfree(group);
> - }
> - iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> + vfio_release_domain(domain, false);
> list_del(&domain->next);
> kfree(domain);
> }
> -
> kfree(iommu);
> }
>
> @@ -1110,6 +1582,8 @@ static const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops
> vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1 = {
> .ioctl = vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl,
> .attach_group = vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group,
> .detach_group = vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group,
> + .pin_pages = vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages,
> + .unpin_pages = vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages,
> };
>
> static int __init vfio_iommu_type1_init(void)
vfio_pin_pages_remote.patch
Description: Text Data
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 05/22] vfio iommu: Added pin and unpin callback functions to vfio_iommu_driver_ops, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 05/22] vfio iommu: Added pin and unpin callback functions to vfio_iommu_driver_ops, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 06/22] vfio iommu type1: Update arguments of vfio_lock_acct, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 08/22] vfio iommu type1: Add find_iommu_group() function, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 07/22] vfio iommu type1: Update argument of vaddr_get_pfn(), Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 09/22] vfio iommu type1: Add task structure to vfio_dma, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 10/22] vfio iommu type1: Add support for mediated devices, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 10/22] vfio iommu type1: Add support for mediated devices,
Alex Williamson <=
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Alex Williamson, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Alex Williamson, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Alex Williamson, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Alex Williamson, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Alex Williamson, 2016/11/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 11/22] vfio iommu: Add blocking notifier to notify DMA_UNMAP, Kirti Wankhede, 2016/11/16