qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 21/25] scsi-disk: fix VERIFY for scsi-block


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 21/25] scsi-disk: fix VERIFY for scsi-block
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:22:56 +0100

When a scsi-disk object receives VERIFY command with BYTCHK bit being zero,
scsi_block_is_passthrough returns false and finally makes req being proceeded
by scsi_block_dma_command. Because scsi_block_dma_command has removed process
of VERIFY, QEMU will abort in this function.

Reported-by: Junlian Bell <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
index a963191..bdd1e5f 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
@@ -2157,6 +2157,13 @@ static int32_t scsi_disk_dma_command(SCSIRequest *req, 
uint8_t *buf)
         DPRINTF("Write %s(sector %" PRId64 ", count %u)\n",
                 (command & 0xe) == 0xe ? "And Verify " : "",
                 r->req.cmd.lba, len);
+    case VERIFY_10:
+    case VERIFY_12:
+    case VERIFY_16:
+        /* We get here only for BYTCHK == 0x01 and only for scsi-block.
+         * As far as DMA is concerned, we can treat it the same as a write;
+         * scsi_block_do_sgio will send VERIFY commands.
+         */
         if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
             goto illegal_request;
         }
@@ -2712,7 +2719,7 @@ static bool scsi_block_is_passthrough(SCSIDiskState *s, 
uint8_t *buf)
     case WRITE_VERIFY_16:
         /* MMC writing cannot be done via DMA helpers, because it sometimes
          * involves writing beyond the maximum LBA or to negative LBA 
(lead-in).
-         * We might use scsi_disk_dma_reqops as long as no writing commands are
+         * We might use scsi_block_dma_reqops as long as no writing commands 
are
          * seen, but performance usually isn't paramount on optical media.  So,
          * just make scsi-block operate the same as scsi-generic for them.
          */
-- 
2.9.3





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]