qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/10] target/ppc: update overflow flags for


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/10] target/ppc: update overflow flags for add/sub
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:26:45 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0

On 02/22/2017 10:44 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
* SO and OV reflects overflow of the 64-bit result in 64-bit mode and
  overflow of the low-order 32-bit result in 32-bit mode

* OV32 reflects overflow of the low-order 32-bit independent of the mode

Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
---
 target/ppc/translate.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
index f3f92aa..43366e7 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
@@ -809,10 +809,19 @@ static inline void gen_op_arith_compute_ov(DisasContext 
*ctx, TCGv arg0,
         tcg_gen_andc_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, t0);
     }
     tcg_temp_free(t0);
-    if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
-        tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
+        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
+        if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+            tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov32);
+        } else {
+            tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
+        }
+    } else {
+        if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+            tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+        }
+        tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);
     }
-    tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);

We're computing this two different ways for no reason.  How about

  if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
    tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
        tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov);
    }
  } else {
    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
    }
    tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
  }


r~




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]