qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc: Allow workarounds for POWER9 DD1


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc: Allow workarounds for POWER9 DD1
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:05:58 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:41:23AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09.05.2017 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
> > POWER9 DD1 silicon has some bugs which mean it a) isn't really compliant
> > with the ISA v3.00 and b) require a number of special workarounds in the
> > kernel.
> > 
> > At the moment, qemu isn't aware of DD1.  For TCG we don't really want it to
> > be (why bother emulating buggy silicon).  But with KVM, the guest does need
> > to be aware of DD1 so it can apply the necessary workarounds.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, the feature negotiation between qemu and the guest strongly
> > favours architected compatibility modes to "raw" CPU modes.  In combination
> > with the above, this means the guest sees architected POWER9 mode, and
> > doesn't apply the DD1 workarounds.  Well, unless it has yet another
> > workaround to partially ignore what qemu tells it.
> > 
> > This patch addresses this by disabling support for compatibility modes when
> > using KVM on a POWER9 DD1 host.
> 
> I first though: Hey, it should be fixed in the guest kernel instead, but
> thinking about this twice, I think you're right. If the CPU is not fully
> compatible to the ISA, we really should not announce it as "architected
> / compatible POWER9" in QEMU.
> So basically ACK to your patch, I've just got a cosmetic request below...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  target/ppc/kvm.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > index 8574c36..591b5b5 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > @@ -2380,6 +2380,17 @@ static void kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass 
> > *oc, void *data)
> >  
> >  #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> >      pcc->radix_page_info = kvm_get_radix_page_info();
> > +
> > +    if ((pcc->pvr & 0xffffff00) == 0x004e0100) {
> 
> Could you please add a proper #define for that magic DD1.0 value to
> cpu-models.h, please?

Good point, done.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]