[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:33:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 26/07/2017 15:30, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
>>> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>>> "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
>>>>> (XP-10)"
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory, w2k falls within that range.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, Windows 2000 is like NT 5.0, XP is like NT 5.1. :(
>>>>
>>>> One possibility is to fix it in SeaBIOS instead: if you get a 2.0 FADT
>>>> and an XSDT and no RSDT, it can build an RSDT and a 1.0 FADT itself,
>>>> patching the RSDT to point to it.
>>>>
>>>> It's a hack, but it's the only place I see to make it "just work". And
>>>> it could be extended nicely in the future.
>>>>
>>>> All QEMU would have to do is to provide an XSDT _instead_ of an RSDT.
>>> I'd support it, however it would break migrated guests with old BIOS
>>> image in RAM on reboot.
>>
>> Why? Shouldn't the old ACPI tables get migrated together with the old
>> BIOS? Or are they rebuilt after reset?
> they are rebuild on reset, but I've been wrong
Hmm so we need this plus keeping old machine types fixed to rev1 and
RSDT. Diffstat will get worse. :)
Paolo
> Looking at SeaBIOS something similar to your suggestion also should work,
> if
> RsdpAddr = find_acpi_rsdp();
> fails, current SeaBIOS falls back to its own ACPI tables.
>
> but it seems that we don't even need to go to that extent,
> all user have to do is to use "-no-acpi" CLI option with QEMU
> for any SeaBIOS to fallback to embedded legacy ACPI tables.
>
> Maybe we should just fix wiki
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Windows2000
> to recommend using '-no-acpi' option when running w2k and
> leave PC machine at rev3 and mention it in release notes.
>
> Opinions?
>
>> Paolo
>>
>>> Legacy users have an option to build SeaBIOS without ACPI from QEMU
>>> support by turning off CONFIG_FW_ROMFILE_LOAD (or use old SeaBIOS)
>>> which leads to using legacy tables included in SeaBIOS.
>>> Then mgmt layer above libvirt which knows what guest OS it's
>>> going to run can pick legacy BIOS image for it.
>>>
>>> But the testing issue will still stay as normally it's not tested
>>> path.
>>>
>>> PS:
>>> For now we are going to revert PC machine to rev1 and leave q35 at rev3
>>> as Michael suggested to keep both w2k and macos happy.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>>>
>>>>> In practice, it is impossible to
>>>>> test *all* Windows versions against ACPI generator changes, even if you
>>>>> try to be thorough (which Phil was). One might not even *know about*
>>>>> "all" Windows versions. So people using w2k and similar should
>>>>> co-maintain the ACPI stuff and report back with testing on the fly;
>>>>> otherwise regressions are impossible to avoid.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/07/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Phil Dennis-Jordan, 2017/07/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Kevin O'Connor, 2017/07/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Igor Mammedov, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Igor Mammedov, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Igor Mammedov, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/07/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, John Snow, 2017/07/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Programmingkid, 2017/07/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows 2000 support, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/07/21