qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] 9pfs: include <linux/limits.h> for XATTR_SIZE_M


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] 9pfs: include <linux/limits.h> for XATTR_SIZE_MAX
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:23:08 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Sun, 07/30 19:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 July 2017 at 17:51, Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 29.07.2017 21:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 29 July 2017 at 14:50, Patrick Steinhardt <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:20:49PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>>> This is likely to break on BSD, but now than patchew has a NetBSD job
> >>>> you can trigger a build RESENDing this patch.
> >>
> >
> > I just checked patchew, and there is FreeBSD job. How far are we from
> > adding more BSDs?
> 
> I now test OpenBSD and NetBSD as well in my pre-merge
> test setup. Patchew could add them as well if desired.
> (vm setup instructions at http://wiki.qemu.org/Hosts/BSD)

No objection to adding more BSDs to patchew as long as I can find a few more
gigabytes RAM to run the VM (BTW I'm also thinking about converting long running
VMs to boot/shutdown on demand, to support more types of guests). But still want
to ask this: how likely it is for a patch to compile on one BSD flavor but fail
on the other?

Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]