qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/28] s390x: replace cpu_s390x_init() with cpu_


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/28] s390x: replace cpu_s390x_init() with cpu_generic_init()
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:03:48 +0200

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:17:21 +0200
Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:30:09 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:52:02 +0200
> > Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> > > cpu_s390x_init() is used only *-user targets indirectly
> > > via cpu_init() macro and has a hack to assign ids to created
> > > cpus (I'm not sure if 'id' really matters to *-user emulation).
> > > 
> > > So to on safe side, instead of having custom wrapper to do numbering
> > > replace it with cpu_generic_init() and use S390CPUClass::next_cpu_id
> > > which could serve the same purpose as static variable and move cpu->id
> > > initialization to s390_cpu_initfn for CONFIG_USER_ONLY use-case.
> > > 
> > > PS:
> > > ifdef is ugly but it allows us to hide s390x detail that isn't
> > > set by *-user targets and reuse generic cpu creation utility
> > > for btoh machine and user emulation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > perhaps cpu->id isn't need by CONFIG_USER_ONLY but I'd leave to it
> > > s390x maintainers to deal with it.
> > > 
> > > CC: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> > > CC: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> > > CC: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> > > CC: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  target/s390x/cpu.h    |  3 +--
> > >  target/s390x/cpu.c    |  7 +++++++
> > >  target/s390x/helper.c | 14 --------------
> > >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > > index bdb9bdb..b6d25c6 100644
> > > --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > > @@ -477,7 +477,6 @@ static inline bool get_per_in_range(CPUS390XState 
> > > *env, uint64_t addr)
> > >  void trigger_pgm_exception(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, uint32_t 
> > > ilen);
> > >  #endif
> > >  
> > > -S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model);
> > >  S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, int64_t id, Error **errp);
> > >  S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp);
> > >  void s390x_translate_init(void);
> > > @@ -641,7 +640,7 @@ static inline unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t 
> > > cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu)
> > >  
> > >  extern void subsystem_reset(void);
> > >  
> > > -#define cpu_init(model) CPU(cpu_s390x_init(model))
> > > +#define cpu_init(cpu_model) cpu_generic_init(TYPE_S390_CPU, cpu_model)
> > >  #define cpu_signal_handler cpu_s390x_signal_handler
> > >  
> > >  void s390_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf);
> > > diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> > > index accef03..e40a26f 100644
> > > --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,13 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> > >          inited = true;
> > >          s390x_translate_init();
> > >      }
> > > +
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > +    {
> > > +        S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
> > > +        cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
> > > +    }
> > > +#endif    
> > 
> > What about the null machine, which calls cpu_init() as well? Am I
> > missing something?  
> it creates only 1 cpu so for it following will be true:
>  cpu->id == 0 and also scc->next_cpu_id == 0 at s390_cpu_initfn() time
> then at realize() time scc->next_cpu_id++ happens and no more cpus could
> be created in case of null machine.
> 
> Considering no -smp support for null-machine, we shouldn't care about
> multiple instantiations with cpu_init() there. 
> If we would ever start caring about -smp there, then we should
> explicitly create cpus with properly set properties like other boards
> do.
ping,

Cornelia,
considering my previous reply does this patch look fine to you?

> 
> >   
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void s390_cpu_finalize(Object *obj)
> > > diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
> > > index aef09e1..632b030 100644
> > > --- a/target/s390x/helper.c
> > > +++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
> > > @@ -129,20 +129,6 @@ out:
> > >      return cpu;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model)
> > > -{
> > > -    Error *err = NULL;
> > > -    S390CPU *cpu;
> > > -    /* Use to track CPU ID for linux-user only */
> > > -    static int64_t next_cpu_id;
> > > -
> > > -    cpu = s390x_new_cpu(cpu_model, next_cpu_id++, &err);
> > > -    if (err) {
> > > -        error_report_err(err);
> > > -    }
> > > -    return cpu;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > >  
> > >  void s390_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)    
> >   
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]