Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] io: Reply to ping frames

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:04:15PM -0700, Brandon Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > It feels like this is still dangerous - the client simply has to
> > interleave each "ping" with a 1 byte binary frame to get around this
> > limit. We need to make sure we have an absolute cap on the output buffer
> > size.
> 
> Okay. I see that now that I look at it more closely. This breed of
> asynchronous I/O is tricky because the conditions for reading/writing are
> all over the place. There's a lot of context to keep in your head.
> 
> I have a fix. And I realized that I was missing a patch in the series for
> RFC-compliant closing of websocket connections, which I must have lost
> during a rebase. Should I submit v3 of the patch series or just add those
> patches to this thread?

It is generally preferred practice to submit new top level threads, rather
than sending more patches to a previous thread.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|