[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mips: Improve macro parenthesization
From: |
Yongbok Kim |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mips: Improve macro parenthesization |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:35:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
On 19/09/2017 15:13, Eric Blake wrote:
> Although none of the existing macro call-sites were broken,
> it's always better to write macros that properly parenthesize
> arguments that can be complex expressions, so that the intended
> order of operations is not broken.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/mips/dsp_helper.c | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/mips/dsp_helper.c b/target/mips/dsp_helper.c
> index dc707934ea..f152fea34a 100644
> --- a/target/mips/dsp_helper.c
> +++ b/target/mips/dsp_helper.c
> @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ typedef union {
> } DSP64Value;
>
> /*** MIPS DSP internal functions begin ***/
> -#define MIPSDSP_ABS(x) (((x) >= 0) ? x : -x)
> -#define MIPSDSP_OVERFLOW_ADD(a, b, c, d) (~(a ^ b) & (a ^ c) & d)
> -#define MIPSDSP_OVERFLOW_SUB(a, b, c, d) ((a ^ b) & (a ^ c) & d)
> +#define MIPSDSP_ABS(x) (((x) >= 0) ? (x) : -(x))
> +#define MIPSDSP_OVERFLOW_ADD(a, b, c, d) (~((a) ^ (b)) & ((a) ^ (c)) & (d))
> +#define MIPSDSP_OVERFLOW_SUB(a, b, c, d) (((a) ^ (b)) & ((a) ^ (c)) & (d))
>
> static inline void set_DSPControl_overflow_flag(uint32_t flag, int position,
> CPUMIPSState *env)
> @@ -1047,47 +1047,47 @@ static inline int32_t mipsdsp_cmpu_lt(uint32_t a,
> uint32_t b)
>
> #define MIPSDSP_SPLIT32_8(num, a, b, c, d) \
> do { \
> - a = (num >> 24) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> - b = (num >> 16) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> - c = (num >> 8) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> - d = num & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> + a = ((num) >> 24) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> + b = ((num) >> 16) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> + c = ((num) >> 8) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> + d = (num) & MIPSDSP_Q0; \
> } while (0)
>
> #define MIPSDSP_SPLIT32_16(num, a, b) \
> do { \
> - a = (num >> 16) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> - b = num & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + a = ((num) >> 16) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + b = (num) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define MIPSDSP_RETURN32_8(a, b, c, d) ((target_long)(int32_t) \
> - (((uint32_t)a << 24) | \
> - (((uint32_t)b << 16) | \
> - (((uint32_t)c << 8) | \
> - ((uint32_t)d & 0xFF)))))
> -#define MIPSDSP_RETURN32_16(a, b) ((target_long)(int32_t) \
> - (((uint32_t)a << 16) | \
> - ((uint32_t)b & 0xFFFF)))
> +#define MIPSDSP_RETURN32_8(a, b, c, d) ((target_long)(int32_t) \
> + (((uint32_t)(a) << 24) | \
> + ((uint32_t)(b) << 16) | \
> + ((uint32_t)(c) << 8) | \
> + ((uint32_t)(d) & 0xFF)))
> +#define MIPSDSP_RETURN32_16(a, b) ((target_long)(int32_t) \
> + (((uint32_t)(a) << 16) | \
> + ((uint32_t)(b) & 0xFFFF)))
>
> #ifdef TARGET_MIPS64
> #define MIPSDSP_SPLIT64_16(num, a, b, c, d) \
> do { \
> - a = (num >> 48) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> - b = (num >> 32) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> - c = (num >> 16) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> - d = num & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + a = ((num) >> 48) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + b = ((num) >> 32) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + c = ((num) >> 16) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> + d = (num) & MIPSDSP_LO; \
> } while (0)
>
> #define MIPSDSP_SPLIT64_32(num, a, b) \
> do { \
> - a = (num >> 32) & MIPSDSP_LLO; \
> - b = num & MIPSDSP_LLO; \
> + a = ((num) >> 32) & MIPSDSP_LLO; \
> + b = (num) & MIPSDSP_LLO; \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define MIPSDSP_RETURN64_16(a, b, c, d) (((uint64_t)a << 48) | \
> - ((uint64_t)b << 32) | \
> - ((uint64_t)c << 16) | \
> - (uint64_t)d)
> -#define MIPSDSP_RETURN64_32(a, b) (((uint64_t)a << 32) | (uint64_t)b)
> +#define MIPSDSP_RETURN64_16(a, b, c, d) (((uint64_t)(a) << 48) | \
> + ((uint64_t)(b) << 32) | \
> + ((uint64_t)(c) << 16) | \
> + (uint64_t)(d))
> +#define MIPSDSP_RETURN64_32(a, b) (((uint64_t)(a) << 32) |
> (uint64_t)(b))
> #endif
>
> /** DSP Arithmetic Sub-class insns **/
>
Reviewed-by: Yongbok Kim <address@hidden>
Regards,
Yongbok