qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] RFC: fw_cfg: add DMA write operation in


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] RFC: fw_cfg: add DMA write operation in sysfs
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:06:05 +0200

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:55:39AM +0000, Hatayama, Daisuke wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:19 AM
> > To: Hatayama, Daisuke <address@hidden>
> > Cc: 'address@hidden' <address@hidden>;
> > 'address@hidden' <address@hidden>; address@hidden;
> > 'address@hidden' <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] RFC: fw_cfg: add DMA write operation in sysfs
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07:20AM +0000, Hatayama, Daisuke wrote:
> > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > Since qemu 2.9, DMA write operations are allowed. However, usage of this
> > > > interface from kernel or user-space is strongly discouraged by the
> > > > maintainers. This patch is meant for experimentations for now.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you (or maintainers?) tell me how experimental the DMA write
> > > operations from kernel are?
> > >
> > > From some technical reason?
> > > Or simply there has not been enough test yet so far?
> > 
> > The concern is security, talking from userspace to hypervisor
> > might become a trivial DOS vector.
> > 
> > If there's need for a specific entry to be accessible from userspace,
> > I'd rather white-list it.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.
> 
> If so, I guess the white-list is done in userspace qemu side,
> and no additional change would be needed for this kernel-side patch set for 
> the white-list feature.
> Is this understanding correct?

No - host side has no idea whether it's guest userspace or
kernel initiating the access.

> > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > index 54b569da3257..e2f2ad1c9c0c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > @@ -524,9 +524,28 @@ static ssize_t fw_cfg_sysfs_read_raw(struct file 
> > > > *filp,
> > struct kobject *kobj,
> > > >       return fw_cfg_read_blob(entry->f.select, buf, pos, count, true);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static ssize_t fw_cfg_sysfs_write_raw(struct file *filp, struct kobject
> > *kobj,
> > > > +                                   struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> > > > +                                   char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct fw_cfg_sysfs_entry *entry = to_entry(kobj);
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (!fw_cfg_dma_enabled())
> > > > +             return -ENOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (pos > entry->f.size)
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (count > entry->f.size - pos)
> > > > +             count = entry->f.size - pos;
> > > > +
> > > > +     return fw_cfg_write_blob(entry->f.select, buf, pos, count);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static struct bin_attribute fw_cfg_sysfs_attr_raw = {
> > > > -     .attr = { .name = "raw", .mode = S_IRUSR },
> > > > +     .attr = { .name = "raw", .mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR },
> > > >       .read = fw_cfg_sysfs_read_raw,
> > > > +     .write = fw_cfg_sysfs_write_raw,
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  /*
> > > > --
> > > > 2.14.1.146.gd35faa819
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > HATAYAMA, Daisuke
> > >
> > 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]