[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] oslib-posix: Use sysctl(2) call to resolve exec
From: |
Kamil Rytarowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] oslib-posix: Use sysctl(2) call to resolve exec_dir on NetBSD |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Nov 2017 18:27:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 |
On 02.11.2017 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 October 2017 at 20:48, Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden> wrote:
>> NetBSD 8.0(beta) ships with KERN_PROC_PATHNAME in sysctl(2).
>> Older NetBSD versions can use argv[0] parsing fallback.
>>
>> This code section is partly shared with FreeBSD.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> util/oslib-posix.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
>> index 382bd4a231..77369c92ce 100644
>> --- a/util/oslib-posix.c
>> +++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
>> #include <libutil.h>
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef __NetBSD__
>> +#include <sys/sysctl.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #include "qemu/mmap-alloc.h"
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE
>> @@ -250,9 +254,14 @@ void qemu_init_exec_dir(const char *argv0)
>> p = buf;
>> }
>> }
>> -#elif defined(__FreeBSD__)
>> +#elif defined(__FreeBSD__) \
>> + || (defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(KERN_PROC_PATHNAME))
>> {
>> +#if defined(__FreeBSD__)
>> static int mib[4] = {CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC, KERN_PROC_PATHNAME, -1};
>> +#else
>> + static int mib[4] = {CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC_ARGS, -1,
>> KERN_PROC_PATHNAME};
>> +#endif
>> size_t len = sizeof(buf) - 1;
>>
>> *buf = '\0';
>
> It's a shame the BSDs can't agree on a single way to implement this :-(
>
> I had a look at how Go implements this:
> https://github.com/golang/go/commit/2fc67e71af142bfa1e7662a4fde361f43509d2d7
>
> and for NetBSD it uses readlink("/proc/curproc/exe"), which would be
> a better fallback for "sysctl not implemented" than the argv[0]
> stuff, perhaps (but then nobody's complained much so perhaps not
> worth the effort now). It also has /proc/curproc/file for OpenBSD, but
> my OpenBSD VM doesn't mount /proc/, which reduces my enthusiasm
> for trying for a "generic for BSDs try various /proc/ paths" approach.
>
> In any case, I think this is better than what we have today,
> so I've applied it to master.
>
It's better to assume that there is no such entity as a shared BSD code
in modern BSD Operating Systems. My opinion is to drop CONFIG_BSD
entirely from qemu and treat __NetBSD__, __FreeBSD__ and __OpenBSD__ as
diverse targets.
(I'm not sure how about bsd-user, whether it should be dropped and
reimplemented on per-OS basis? I think that in the current state of
affairs it's a reasonable move forwards.).
OpenBSD does not ship any interface except argv[0] to get executable
path. They have removed their procfs.
NetBSD and FreeBSD deprecate procfs and fallback to /proc shall not be
introduced into new code.
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature