[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation
From: |
Yuval Shaia |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:56:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:05:18PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:54:52PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > RFC -> V2:
> > - Full implementation of the pvrdma device
> > - Backend is an ibdevice interface, no need for the KDBR module
> >
> > General description
> > ===================
> > PVRDMA is the QEMU implementation of VMware's paravirtualized RDMA device.
> > It works with its Linux Kernel driver AS IS, no need for any special guest
> > modifications.
> >
> > While it complies with the VMware device, it can also communicate with bare
> > metal RDMA-enabled machines and does not require an RDMA HCA in the host, it
> > can work with Soft-RoCE (rxe).
> >
> > It does not require the whole guest RAM to be pinned
>
> What happens if guest attempts to register all its memory?
>
> > allowing memory
> > over-commit
> > and, even if not implemented yet, migration support will be
> > possible with some HW assistance.
>
> What does "HW assistance" mean here?
> Can it work with any existing hardware?
>
> >
> > Design
> > ======
> > - Follows the behavior of VMware's pvrdma device, however is not tightly
> > coupled with it
>
> Everything seems to be in pvrdma. Since it's not coupled, could you
> split code to pvrdma specific and generic parts?
>
> > and most of the code can be reused if we decide to
> > continue to a Virtio based RDMA device.
The current design takes into account a future code reuse with virtio-rdma
device although not sure it is 100%.
We divided it to four software layers:
- Front-end interface with PCI:
- pvrdma_main.c
- Front-end interface with pvrdma driver:
- pvrdma_cmd.c
- pvrdma_qp_ops.c
- pvrdma_dev_ring.c
- pvrdma_utils.c
- Device emulation:
- pvrdma_rm.c
- Back-end interface:
- pvrdma_backend.c
So in the future, when starting to work on virtio-rdma device we will move
the generic code to generic directory.
Any reason why we want to split it now, when we have only one device?
>
> I suspect that without virtio we won't be able to do any future
> extensions.
As i see it these are two different issues, virtio RDMA device is on our
plate but the contribution of VMWare pvrdma device to QEMU is no doubt a
real advantage that will allow customers that runs ESX to easy move to QEMU.
>
> > - It exposes 3 BARs:
> > BAR 0 - MSIX, utilize 3 vectors for command ring, async events and
> > completions
> > BAR 1 - Configuration of registers
>
> What does this mean?
Device control operations:
- Setting of interrupt mask.
- Setup of Device/Driver shared configuration area.
- Reset device, activate device etc.
- Device commands such as create QP, create MR etc.
>
> > BAR 2 - UAR, used to pass HW commands from driver.
>
> A detailed description of above belongs in documentation.
Will do.
>
> > - The device performs internal management of the RDMA
> > resources (PDs, CQs, QPs, ...), meaning the objects
> > are not directly coupled to a physical RDMA device resources.
>
> I am wondering how do you make connections? QP#s are exposed on
> the wire during connection management.
QP#s that guest sees are the QP#s that are used on the wire.
The meaning of "internal management of the RDMA resources" is that we keep
context of internal QP in device (ex rings).
>
> > The pvrdma backend is an ibdevice interface that can be exposed
> > either by a Soft-RoCE(rxe) device on machines with no RDMA device,
> > or an HCA SRIOV function(VF/PF).
> > Note that ibdevice interfaces can't be shared between pvrdma devices,
> > each one requiring a separate instance (rxe or SRIOV VF).
>
> So what's the advantage of this over pass-through then?
>
>
> >
> > Tests and performance
> > =====================
> > Tested with SoftRoCE backend (rxe)/Mellanox ConnectX3,
> > and Mellanox ConnectX4 HCAs with:
> > - VMs in the same host
> > - VMs in different hosts
> > - VMs to bare metal.
> >
> > The best performance achieved with ConnectX HCAs and buffer size
> > bigger than 1MB which was the line rate ~ 50Gb/s.
> > The conclusion is that using the PVRDMA device there are no
> > actual performance penalties compared to bare metal for big enough
> > buffers (which is quite common when using RDMA), while allowing
> > memory overcommit.
> >
> > Marcel Apfelbaum (3):
> > mem: add share parameter to memory-backend-ram
> > docs: add pvrdma device documentation.
> > MAINTAINERS: add entry for hw/net/pvrdma
> >
> > Yuval Shaia (2):
> > pci/shpc: Move function to generic header file
> > pvrdma: initial implementation
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > Makefile.objs | 1 +
> > backends/hostmem-file.c | 25 +-
> > backends/hostmem-ram.c | 4 +-
> > backends/hostmem.c | 21 +
> > configure | 9 +-
> > default-configs/arm-softmmu.mak | 2 +
> > default-configs/i386-softmmu.mak | 1 +
> > default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak | 1 +
> > docs/pvrdma.txt | 145 ++++++
> > exec.c | 26 +-
> > hw/net/Makefile.objs | 7 +
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma.h | 179 +++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend.c | 986
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend.h | 74 +++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend_defs.h | 68 +++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_cmd.c | 338 ++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_defs.h | 121 +++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_api.h | 580 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_ring.c | 138 +++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_ring.h | 42 ++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_ib_verbs.h | 399 +++++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_main.c | 664 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_qp_ops.c | 187 +++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_qp_ops.h | 26 +
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_ring.h | 134 +++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm.c | 791 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm.h | 54 ++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm_defs.h | 111 ++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_types.h | 37 ++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_utils.c | 133 +++++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_utils.h | 41 ++
> > hw/net/pvrdma/trace-events | 9 +
> > hw/pci/shpc.c | 11 +-
> > include/exec/memory.h | 23 +
> > include/exec/ram_addr.h | 3 +-
> > include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h | 3 +
> > include/qemu/cutils.h | 10 +
> > include/qemu/osdep.h | 2 +-
> > include/sysemu/hostmem.h | 2 +-
> > include/sysemu/kvm.h | 2 +-
> > memory.c | 16 +-
> > util/oslib-posix.c | 4 +-
> > util/oslib-win32.c | 2 +-
> > 44 files changed, 5378 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 docs/pvrdma.txt
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_backend_defs.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_cmd.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_defs.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_api.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_ring.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_dev_ring.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_ib_verbs.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_main.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_qp_ops.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_qp_ops.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_ring.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_rm_defs.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_types.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_utils.c
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/pvrdma_utils.h
> > create mode 100644 hw/net/pvrdma/trace-events
> >
> > --
> > 2.13.5
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/5] pvrdma: initial implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2017/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Yuval Shaia, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Yuval Shaia, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2017/12/21
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] hw/pvrdma: PVRDMA device implementation,
Yuval Shaia <=