qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] virtio-blk: check for NULL BlockDr


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] virtio-blk: check for NULL BlockDriverState
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:00:25 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:56:12PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.01.2018 um 13:38 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 24.01.2018 um 12:31 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:01:49AM -0600, Mark Kanda wrote:
> > > > > Add a BlockDriverState NULL check to virtio_blk_handle_request()
> > > > > to prevent a segfault if the drive is forcibly removed using HMP
> > > > > 'drive_del' (without performing a hotplug 'device_del' first).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Kanda <address@hidden>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Karl Heubaum <address@hidden>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Ameya More <address@hidden>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > > > > index b1532e4..76ddbbf 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > > > > @@ -507,6 +507,13 @@ static int 
> > > > > virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
> > > > >          return -1;
> > > > >      }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +    /* If the drive was forcibly removed (e.g. HMP 'drive_del'), the 
> > > > > block
> > > > > +     * driver state may be NULL and there is nothing left to do. */
> > > > > +    if (!blk_bs(req->dev->blk)) {
> > > > 
> > > > Adding Markus Armbruster to check my understanding of drive_del:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. If id is a node name (e.g. created via blockdev-add) then attempting
> > > >    to remove the root node produces the "Node %s is in use" error.  In
> > > >    that case this patch isn't needed.
> > > > 
> > > > 2. If id is a BlockBackend (e.g. created via -drive) then removing the
> > > >    root node is allowed.  The BlockBackend stays in place but blk->root
> > > >    becomes NULL, hence this patch is needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Markus: What are the valid use cases for #2?  If blk->bs becomes NULL I
> > > > would think a lot more code beyond virtio-blk can segfault.
> > > 
> > > blk->root = NULL is completely normal, it is what happens with removable
> > > media when the drive is empty.
> > > 
> > > The problem, which was first reported during the 2.10 RC phase and was
> > > worked around in IDE code then, is that Paolo's commit 99723548561 added
> > > unconditional bdrv_inc/dec_in_flight() calls. I am pretty sure that any
> > > segfaults that Mark is seeing have the same cause.
> > > 
> > > We do need an in-flight counter even for those requests so that
> > > blk_drain() works correctly, so just making the calls condition wouldn't
> > > be right. However, this needs to become a separate counter in
> > > BlockBackend, and the drain functions must be changed to make use of it.
> > > 
> > > I did post rough patches back then, but they weren't quite ready, and
> > > since then they have fallen through the cracks.
> > 
> > Will you send a new version of that patch series?
> 
> I would like to continue my work on the drain functions (which this
> would be a part of) sooner or later, but the work to enable libvirt to
> use blockdev-add is at a higher priority at the moment.
> 
> So if you can wait, I'll get to it eventually. If not, feel free to pick
> up the patches.

Okay, I'll let you know early next week whether I am able to work on it.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]