qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost-user: avoid misaligned access


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost-user: avoid misaligned access
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 04:36:48 +0200

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:01:07AM +0000, Zhoujian (jay) wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 2:20 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Cc: Zhoujian (jay) <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [PATCH] vhost-user: avoid misaligned access
> > 
> > We can't pass a pointer to memory field directly since it's within a packed
> > structure, so isn't aligned.
> > Pass a pointer on stack and copy.
> > 
> > Fixes: 30c4cc7 ("vhost: used_memslots refactoring")
> > Cc: Jay Zhou <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > 
> > I had to apply this to fix make check errors with clang.
> > Pls review, test and ack.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> >  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index
> > c12fdd9..a44ee7f 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> > @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct
> > vhost_dev *dev,
> >      bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> > 
> > VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
> >      VhostUserMsg msg_reply;
> > +    VhostUserMemory memory = {};
> >      int region_i, msg_i;
> > 
> >      VhostUserMsg msg = {
> > @@ -407,10 +408,11 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct
> > vhost_dev *dev,
> >          msg.hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
> >      }
> > 
> > -    if (vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &msg.payload.memory, fds) < 0) {
> > +    if (vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &memory, fds) < 0) {
> >          error_report("Failed preparing vhost-user memory table msg");
> >          return -1;
> >      }
> > +    msg.payload.memory = memory;
> > 
> >      fd_num = msg.payload.memory.nregions;
> > 
> > @@ -549,16 +551,19 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev
> > *dev,
> >          .hdr.request = VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE,
> >          .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
> >      };
> > +    VhostUserMemory memory = {};
> > 
> >      if (reply_supported) {
> >          msg.hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
> >      }
> > 
> > -    if (vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &msg.payload.memory, fds) < 0) {
> > +    if (vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &memory, fds) < 0) {
> >          error_report("Failed preparing vhost-user memory table msg");
> >          return -1;
> >      }
> > 
> > +    msg.payload.memory = memory;
> > +
> >      fd_num = msg.payload.memory.nregions;
> > 
> >      if (!fd_num) {
> > @@ -1575,8 +1580,11 @@ static void vhost_user_set_used_memslots(struct
> > vhost_dev *dev)  {
> >      int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> >      VhostUserMsg msg;
> > +    VhostUserMemory memory = {};
> > +
> > +    vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &memory, fds);
> > 
> > -    vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &msg.payload.memory, fds);
> > +    msg.payload.memory = memory;
> >  }

FYI I think it's better to pass pointer to msg to
avoid alignment issues.

> Hi Michael, here should be like this:
> 
> 
> static void vhost_user_set_used_memslots(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>  {
>      int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> -    VhostUserMsg msg;
> +    VhostUserMemory memory = {};
>  
> -    vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &msg.payload.memory, fds);
> +    vhost_user_prepare_msg(dev, &memory, fds);
>  }
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jay


But what's the point of all this? The structure is discarded
after being initialized. Doesn't look right to me.

> > 
> >  const VhostOps user_ops = {
> > --
> > MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]