qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3 01/22] target/arm: A53: Initialize


From: Aaron Lindsay
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3 01/22] target/arm: A53: Initialize PMCEID[01]
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 11:17:00 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Mar 20 02:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 03/19/2018 09:35 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On Mar 18 23:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Aaron,
> >>
> >> On 03/16/2018 09:30 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> >>> A53 advertises ARM_FEATURE_PMU, but wasn't initializing pmceid[01].
> >>> pmceid[01] are already being initialized to zero for both A15 and A57.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>>  target/arm/cpu64.c | 2 ++
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> >>> index 991d764..8c4db31 100644
> >>> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> >>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> >>> @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ static void aarch64_a53_initfn(Object *obj)
> >>>      cpu->id_isar5 = 0x00011121;
> >>>      cpu->id_aa64pfr0 = 0x00002222;
> >>>      cpu->id_aa64dfr0 = 0x10305106;
> >>> +    cpu->pmceid0 = 0x00000000;
> >>> +    cpu->pmceid1 = 0x00000000;
> >>>      cpu->id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
> >>>      cpu->id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001122; /* 40 bit physical addr */
> >>>      cpu->dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
> >>>
> >>
> >> Maybe we can move this at a single place in arm_cpu_post_init():
> >>
> >>     if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU)) {
> >>         cpu->pmceid0 = 0x00000000;
> >>         cpu->pmceid1 = 0x00000000;
> >>     }
> > 
> > I like consolidating the initialization - though I think it can go in
> > arm_cpu_realizefn() with the preexisting PMU-related id_aa64dfr0
> > initialization since it is constant once you've chosen a type of
> > processor. One of the other patches in this set actually already adds
> > some PMCEID initialization there based on PMCR.N.
> 
> Indeed, arm_cpu_realizefn() is a good place.

I've consolidated the pmceid[01] initialization into arm_cpu_realizefn()
for v4.

-Aaron

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]