qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/5] target-microblaze: Respect MSR.PVR as re


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/5] target-microblaze: Respect MSR.PVR as read-only
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:17:58 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 04/19/2018 10:33 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:56:40AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 04/19/2018 01:21 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>>>  static inline void msr_write(DisasContext *dc, TCGv v)
>>>  {
>>> -    TCGv t;
>>> -
>>> -    t = tcg_temp_new();
>>>      dc->cpustate_changed = 1;
>>>      /* PVR bit is not writable.  */
>>> -    tcg_gen_andi_tl(t, v, ~MSR_PVR);
>>> -    tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_SR[SR_MSR], cpu_SR[SR_MSR], MSR_PVR);
>>> -    tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_SR[SR_MSR], cpu_SR[SR_MSR], v);
>>> -    tcg_temp_free(t);
>>> +    tcg_gen_deposit_tl(cpu_SR[SR_MSR], v, cpu_SR[SR_MSR], MSR_PVR_SHIFT, 
>>> 1);
>>>  }
>>
>> Um... the old code was correct, but the new code isn't.
>>
>> The new code sets msr to v, with bit 10 set to the old msr bit 0.
>>
>> Why do you believe the old code to be wrong?
> 
> The old code was incorrectly ORing v instead of t...

Ah, yes.

> What about the following?
>     tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_SR[SR_MSR], cpu_SR[SR_MSR], MSR_PVR_SHIFT);
>     tcg_gen_deposit_tl(cpu_SR[SR_MSR], v, cpu_SR[SR_MSR], MSR_PVR_SHIFT, 1);

*shrug* While that would be functional, I don't think it's any better than just
fixing the typo in the OR.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]