Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/8] MemoryDevice: introduce and use ResourceHandler

[Igor Mammedov]

On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:19:25 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 04.05.2018 10:49, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu,  3 May 2018 17:49:28 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hotplug handlers usually have the following tasks:
> >> 1. Allocate some resources for a new device
> >> 2. Make the new device visible for the guest
> >> 3. Notify the guest about the new device
> >>
> >> Hotplug handlers have right now one limitation: They handle their own
> >> context and only care about resources they manage.
> >>
> >> We can have devices that need certain other resources that are e.g.
> >> system resources managed by the machine. We need a clean way to assign
> >> these resources (without violating layers as brought up by Igor).
> >>
> >> One example is virtio-mem/virtio-pmem. Both device types need to be
> >> assigned some region in guest physical address space. This device memory
> >> belongs to the machine and is managed by it. However, virito devices are
> >> hotplugged using the hotplug handler their proxy device implements. So we
> >> could trigger e.g. a PCI hotplug handler for virtio-pci or a CSS/CCW
> >> hotplug handler for virtio-ccw. But definetly not the machine.
> >>
> >> So let's generalize the task of "assigning" resources and use it directly
> >> for memory devices. We now have a clean way to support any kind of memory
> >> device - independent of the underlying device type. Right now, only one
> >> resource handler per device can be supported (in addition to the existing
> >> hotplug handler).  
> > So far I've just skimmed through series and still don't get clear
> > picture if new interface is really needed.
> > I'd like very much to see patches for how virtio-[p]mem in CCW and PCI
> > case would utilize this.  
> 
> Sure, I think you've seen the problematic parts in the latest
> virtio-pmem prototype
> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg151081.html).
> 
> There, we do the assignment from the realize function, which you
> described as layer violation. I will ask Pankaj to rebase his work on
> this series.
That's too premature at the moment.

> Until then, I can point you at the current QEMU side prototype of
> virtio-mem. I won't be posting these as patches as there are still many
> things to sort out and clean up. The prototype currently works on x86
> and s390x.
> 
> You can find the latest prototype on github, including patches of this
> series at https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/qemu/tree/virtio-mem
> 
> Interesting patches are:
> - "s390x: inititalize memory region for memory devices"
> -- Provide a region for memory devices just like x86
> - "virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory"
> -- Prototype of virtio-mem.
> - "virtio-ccw: add proxy for virtio-mem"
> -- CCW proxy device for virtio-mem (using the CSS/CCW hotplug handler)
> - "virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory"
> -- PCI proxy device for virtio-mem (using PCI hotplug handler)
> 
> Note how virtio-mem implements the MemoryDevice interface and how
> resource assignments happens without any layer violations (and no
> modifications to any hotplug handler).
Thanks, that should be sufficient to get idea.
I'll look into it and come back here with concrete comments or
suggesting alternative.