qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1471904] Re: qemu fails under NeXTStep 3.3 when ac


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1471904] Re: qemu fails under NeXTStep 3.3 when accessing ROM in SCSI-Adapter am53c974
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:28:39 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSF 202 2017-01-01)

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Uwe Lienig wrote:
the issue is still reproducible. I'm still eager to run this old beast
because of an old database application that has not been converted to
our new platform. There is an old NeXTStep Black Hardware that is
running the sybase database. The frontend runs under NeXTStep intel.
Using qemu would allow to remove some old i486 NeXTStep systems.

This reminds me to this:

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg00280.html

my reply to a patch submitted on list a few years ago that was needed to fix OpenStep (which might be the same for NeXTStep too) but at the end after several iterations it was not accepted due to fear that it may break backwards migration which was deemed more important than supporting old guests at the time. Maybe this could be reconsidered now if it fixes your problem or at least you can have a local fix.

The actual patch needed is just this:

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02360.html

from this series:

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02356.html

which is the last version I've found. You can discover the whole story and a lot of background info by searching the qemu-devel list archives for "Microport UNIX". For KVM, I think another set of patches are needed (or one of those patches) that are linked from one of those messages somewhere but I don't remember that.

This may not fix your SCSI problems but could be relevant to the other IDE bug mentioned in this bug but it was easier to reply to this email than trying to log into launchpad. Sorry for the noise if this turns out not to be relevant.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]