|
| From: | Eric Blake |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] iotests: add 222 to test basic fleecing |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2018 20:49:13 -0500 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
On 06/26/2018 05:22 PM, John Snow wrote:
Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden> --- tests/qemu-iotests/222 | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222 diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/222 b/tests/qemu-iotests/222 new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..133d10c351 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/222 @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# +# This test covers the basic fleecing workflow. +# +# Copyright (C) 2018 Red Hat, Inc. +# John helped, too.
LOL.
+
+patterns = [("0x5d", "0", "64k"),
+ ("0xd5", "1M", "64k"),
+ ("0xdc", "32M", "64k"),
+ ("0xcd", "67043328", "64k")] # 64M - 64K
+
+overwrite = [("0xab", "0", "64k"), # Full overwrite
+ ("0xad", "1015808", "64k"), # Partial-left (1M-32K)
+ ("0x1d", "33587200", "64k"), # Partial-right (32M+32K)
+ ("0xea", "64M", "64k")] # Adjacent-right (64M)
+
+with iotests.FilePath('base.img') as base_img_path, \
+ iotests.FilePath('fleece.img') as fleece_img_path, \
+ iotests.FilePath('nbd.sock') as nbd_sock_path, \
+ iotests.VM() as vm:
Does python require \ even after ','?The test looks valid - you are definitely reading data over NBD from the point in time that you started the blockdev-backup job, even while the source image continues to be modified.
+ for p in overwrite:
+ cmd = "write -P%s %s %s" % p
+ log(cmd)
+ log(vm.hmp_qemu_io(srcNode, cmd))
+
+ log('')
+ log('--- Verifying Data ---')
+ log('')
+
+ for p in patterns:
+ cmd = "read -P%s %s %s" % p
+ log(cmd)
+ assert qemu_io_silent('-r', '-f', 'raw', '-c', cmd, nbd_uri) == 0
Perhaps additional steps would be to then stop the NBD export, stop the block job, delete the tgtNode fleecing file, then stop qemu, and finally check that the overwritten patterns correctly show up in the source image (that is, also prove that we can tear down a job, and that the overwrites worked). And we may want to enhance this test (or use it as a starting point to copy into a new test) to play with persistent dirty bitmaps thrown into the mix as well. But what you have is already a great start to prevent regressions, so:
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden> -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |