qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: get rid of kvm_get_fallb


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: get rid of kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info()
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:54:53 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:48:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Now that we're checking our MMU configuration is supported by KVM,
> rather than adjusting it to KVM, it doesn't really make sense to
> have a fallback for kvm_get_smmu_info(). If KVM is too old or buggy
> to provide the details, we should rather treat this as an error.
> 
> This patch thus adds error reporting to kvm_get_smmu_info() and get
> rid of the fallback code. QEMU will now terminate if KVM fails to
> provide MMU details. This may break some very old setups, but the
> simplification is worth the sacrifice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>

Ok, so immediately failing with an old kernel wasn't actually what I
had in mind.  Instead I was suggesting just skipping the checks and
hoping for the best.  Still, either way the relevant kernels are
really ancient now, so I'll apply anyway.

> ---
>  target/ppc/kvm.c |  117 
> +++++++++---------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index 4df4ff6cbff2..b6000f12b98f 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -248,107 +248,25 @@ static int kvm_booke206_tlb_init(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>  
>  
>  #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> -static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> -                                       struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> +static void kvm_get_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info 
> *info,
> +                              Error **errp)
>  {
> -    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> +    int ret;
>  
> -    memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> -
> -    /* We don't have the new KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO ioctl, so
> -     * need to "guess" what the supported page sizes are.
> -     *
> -     * For that to work we make a few assumptions:
> -     *
> -     * - Check whether we are running "PR" KVM which only supports 4K
> -     *   and 16M pages, but supports them regardless of the backing
> -     *   store characteritics. We also don't support 1T segments.
> -     *
> -     *   This is safe as if HV KVM ever supports that capability or PR
> -     *   KVM grows supports for more page/segment sizes, those versions
> -     *   will have implemented KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO and thus we
> -     *   will not hit this fallback
> -     *
> -     * - Else we are running HV KVM. This means we only support page
> -     *   sizes that fit in the backing store. Additionally we only
> -     *   advertize 64K pages if the processor is ARCH 2.06 and we assume
> -     *   P7 encodings for the SLB and hash table. Here too, we assume
> -     *   support for any newer processor will mean a kernel that
> -     *   implements KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO and thus doesn't hit
> -     *   this fallback.
> -     */
> -    if (kvmppc_is_pr(cs->kvm_state)) {
> -        /* No flags */
> -        info->flags = 0;
> -        info->slb_size = 64;
> -
> -        /* Standard 4k base page size segment */
> -        info->sps[0].page_shift = 12;
> -        info->sps[0].slb_enc = 0;
> -        info->sps[0].enc[0].page_shift = 12;
> -        info->sps[0].enc[0].pte_enc = 0;
> -
> -        /* Standard 16M large page size segment */
> -        info->sps[1].page_shift = 24;
> -        info->sps[1].slb_enc = SLB_VSID_L;
> -        info->sps[1].enc[0].page_shift = 24;
> -        info->sps[1].enc[0].pte_enc = 0;
> -    } else {
> -        int i = 0;
> -
> -        /* HV KVM has backing store size restrictions */
> -        info->flags = KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL;
> -
> -        if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)) {
> -            info->flags |= KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS;
> -        }
> -
> -        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> -            env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> -            info->slb_size = 32;
> -        } else {
> -            info->slb_size = 64;
> -        }
> -
> -        /* Standard 4k base page size segment */
> -        info->sps[i].page_shift = 12;
> -        info->sps[i].slb_enc = 0;
> -        info->sps[i].enc[0].page_shift = 12;
> -        info->sps[i].enc[0].pte_enc = 0;
> -        i++;
> -
> -        /* 64K on MMU 2.06 and later */
> -        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> -            env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> -            info->sps[i].page_shift = 16;
> -            info->sps[i].slb_enc = 0x110;
> -            info->sps[i].enc[0].page_shift = 16;
> -            info->sps[i].enc[0].pte_enc = 1;
> -            i++;
> -        }
> -
> -        /* Standard 16M large page size segment */
> -        info->sps[i].page_shift = 24;
> -        info->sps[i].slb_enc = SLB_VSID_L;
> -        info->sps[i].enc[0].page_shift = 24;
> -        info->sps[i].enc[0].pte_enc = 0;
> +    if (!kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "KVM doesn't expose the MMU features it supports");
> +        error_append_hint(errp, "Consider switching to a newer KVM\n");
> +        return;
>      }
> -}
> -
> -static void kvm_get_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info 
> *info)
> -{
> -    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> -    int ret;
>  
> -    if (kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> -        ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(cs->kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> -        if (ret == 0) {
> -            return;
> -        }
> +    ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(cs->kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> +    if (ret == 0) {
> +        return;
>      }
>  
> -    kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(cpu, info);
> +    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> +                     "KVM failed to provide the MMU features it supports");
>  }
>  
>  struct ppc_radix_page_info *kvm_get_radix_page_info(void)
> @@ -415,7 +333,7 @@ bool kvmppc_hpt_needs_host_contiguous_pages(void)
>          return false;
>      }
>  
> -    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> +    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info, &error_fatal);
>      return !!(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL);
>  }
>  
> @@ -423,13 +341,18 @@ void kvm_check_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>  {
>      struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info smmu_info;
>      int iq, ik, jq, jk;
> +    Error *local_err = NULL;
>  
>      /* For now, we only have anything to check on hash64 MMUs */
>      if (!cpu->hash64_opts || !kvm_enabled()) {
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> +    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info, &local_err);
> +    if (local_err) {
> +        error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> +        return;
> +    }
>  
>      if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)
>          && !(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS)) {
> @@ -2168,7 +2091,7 @@ uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size, 
> unsigned int hash_shift)
>  
>      /* Find the largest hardware supported page size that's less than
>       * or equal to the (logical) backing page size of guest RAM */
> -    kvm_get_smmu_info(POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu), &info);
> +    kvm_get_smmu_info(POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu), &info, &error_fatal);
>      rampagesize = qemu_getrampagesize();
>      best_page_shift = 0;
>  
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]