[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvmtool test PATCH 24/24] kvmtool: arm: Add support fo

From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvmtool test PATCH 24/24] kvmtool: arm: Add support for creating VM with PA size
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:58:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0


On 07/05/2018 09:51 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 July 2018 at 16:51, Will Deacon <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:41:18PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Not really. Let's say I want my IPA space split in two: memory covers
>>> the low 47 bit, and I want MMIO spanning the top 47 bit. With your
>>> scheme, you'd end-up with a 47bit IPA space, while you really want 48
>>> bits (MMIO space implemented by userspace isn't registered to the
>>> kernel).
>> That still sounds quite niche for a VM. Does QEMU do that?
> Not at 47 bits, but we have RAM up to the 256GB mark, and
> MMIO above that (including a large PCI window), so the general
> arrangement of having the top end of the IPA space not
> necessarily be things we've told the kernel about definitely
> exists.

Is this document (2012) still a reference document?
(especially Fig 5?)

Peter, comments in QEMU hw/arm/virt.c suggested next RAM chunk should be
added at 2TB. This doc suggests to put it at 8TB. I understand the PA
memory map only is suggested but shouldn't we align?



> thanks
> -- PMM
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]