Re: [Qemu-devel] hw/display/sm501* status

[Peter Maydell]

On 16 July 2018 at 21:26, BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden> wrote:
> I could list sm501 in the sam460ex section thus formally taking
> sub-maintainership but this would only go as far that I'll get cc-d on
> changes and try to review them. I still can't (and don't want to) maintain
> my own tree and send pull requests directly so I'd need someone's help with
> that who can take my patches and merge them via their tree. If it's OK to
> continue to use the PPC tree for that I'm fine with that if David agrees
> (which I think he did above).
>
> So is it OK to add sm501 to sam460ex section so I claim responsibility for
> changes and will continue sending patches cc-ing David (and maybe Gerd to
> help spotting problems) then David could take these via the PPC tree?

I think that makes sense. sh4 is pretty dead and if sm501's major
active user is the sam460ex then listing it there seems reasonable.

thanks
-- PMM