[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] seccomp branch queue

From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] seccomp branch queue
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:47:46 +0100

On 25 July 2018 at 15:16, Eduardo Otubo <address@hidden> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 18a398f6a39df4b08ff86ac0d38384193ca5f4cc:
>   Update version for v3.0.0-rc2 release (2018-07-24 22:06:31 +0100)
> are available in the Git repository at:
>   https://github.com/otubo/qemu.git tags/pull-seccomp-20180725
> for you to fetch changes up to 5b2f59307372bae13a2ff95706646674eccb65e0:
>   RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available (2018-07-25 
> 16:07:31 +0200)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> pull-seccomp-20180725
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Marc-André Lureau (2):
>       seccomp: use SIGSYS signal instead of killing the thread
>       RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available

Hi. This fails to compile with clang:

  CC      qemu-seccomp.o
qemu-seccomp.c:112:1: error: unused function 'qemu_seccomp'
qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args)

This is because clang is stricter about warning about static inline
functions defined in .c files but never used and your ifdef
guard on the callsite is not matched by one around the function

-- PMM

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]