qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] ?==?utf-8?q? [PULL v3 00/46] MIPS queue August 21, 201


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ?==?utf-8?q? [PULL v3 00/46] MIPS queue August 21, 2018 v3
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:06:20 +0200
User-agent: SOGoMail 2.3.10

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [PULL v3 00/46] MIPS queue August 21, 2018 v3
> Date: Thursday, August 23, 2018 12:19 CEST
> From: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> To: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
> CC: QEMU Developers <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
>
>
>
> > On 21 August 2018 at 14:31, Aleksandar Markovic
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > From: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 
> > > 659b11e7a7239529cfdb4968418268ff9aa22d88:
> > >
> > > Merge remote-tracking branch 
> > > 'remotes/vivier2/tags/linux-user-for-3.1-pull-request' into staging 
> > > (2018-08-21 11:36:15 +0100)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/AMarkovic/qemu tags/mips-queue-aug-21-2018
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 7bfa634d0a73b74f2b84a5cd13d055e61210c356:
> > >
> > > target/mips: Add definition of nanoMIPS I7200 CPU (2018-08-21 14:59:32 
> > > +0200)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > MIPS queue August 21, 2018 v3
> > >
> > > In v2, the initial ('since') commit was wrong.
> > > In v1, there were three missing "Reviewed-by" lines. Please use
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hi; I'm afraid this fails to build on clang for the linux-user
> > targets:
> >
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/target/mips/translate.c:1947:20:
> > error: unused function 'check_cp0_mt' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > static inline void check_cp0_mt(DisasContext *ctx)
> > ^
> > 1 error generated.
> >
> > This function is only called inside #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > sections, but the function definition is not similarly guarded.
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
>

OK. My bad. I am preparing a corrected pull request. Build tests are running 
for each patch. If all is well, I am going to send v4 afterwards.

Thanks,
Aleksandar

 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]