qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Machine queue, 2018-10-18


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Machine queue, 2018-10-18
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 12:27:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 19/10/2018 22:23, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:53:45PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:44:08 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 October 2018 at 21:03, Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
The following changes since commit 09558375a634e17cea6cfbfec883ac2376d2dc7f:

  Merge remote-tracking branch 
'remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20181016-1' into staging (2018-10-16 
17:42:56 +0100)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://github.com/ehabkost/qemu.git tags/machine-next-pull-request

for you to fetch changes up to 6d8e1bcc7dd5e819ce81e6a87fffe23e39c700cc:

  numa: Clean up error reporting in parse_numa() (2018-10-17 16:33:40 -0300)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Machine queue, 2018-10-18

* sysbus init/realize cleanups
  (Cédric Le Goater, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
* memory-device refactoring (David Hildenbrand)
* -smp: deprecate incorrect CPUs topology (Igor Mammedov)
* -numa parsing cleanups (Markus Armbruster)
* Fix hostmem-file memory leak (Zhang Yi)
* Typo fix (Li Qiang)

----------------------------------------------------------------


Hi. This had some problems in merge testing, I'm afraid:

On aarch64 host, warnings running tests/cpu-plug-test for i386 and s390 targets:

TEST: tests/cpu-plug-test... (pid=12602)
  /i386/cpu-plug/pc-i440fx-3.0/cpu-add/1x3x2&maxcpus=12:
qemu-system-i386: warning: Invalid CPU topology deprecated: sockets
(1) * cores (3) * threads (2) != maxcpus (12)
[...]

(plus similar ppc64, x86_64 targets)

Ouch.  Apologies.

Can we please do something make sure "make check" will fail on
these cases?  I'd like to be able to trust CI systems like
travis-ci.


we probably don't want make check fail on warning.

I disagree.  If a warning is blocking a pull request from being
merged, it must make CI systems fail too.  Otherwise we're
defeating the purpose of CI systems.

We can, we also have the hardware (courtesy of Packet), we just need to
make time to set it up.

QEMU Summit is a good place where to talk about this.



Test was written with assumption that s/c/t tuples matches initially present 
CPUs, hence a warning.
Would something like following fix the issue (local x86 build/test looks fixed 
with it)?

It works for me.  I will queue it on machine-next, thanks!


diff --git a/tests/cpu-plug-test.c b/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
index 3e93c8e..f4a677d 100644
--- a/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
+++ b/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
@@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ static void test_plug_with_cpu_add(gconstpointer data)
     unsigned int i;
args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            s->machine, s->cpu_model,
                            s->sockets, s->cores, s->threads, s->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
- for (i = s->sockets * s->cores * s->threads; i < s->maxcpus; i++) {
+    for (i = 1; i < s->maxcpus; i++) {
         response = qmp("{ 'execute': 'cpu-add',"
                        "  'arguments': { 'id': %d } }", i);
         g_assert(response);
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void test_plug_without_cpu_add(gconstpointer data)
     QDict *response;
args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            s->machine, s->cpu_model,
                            s->sockets, s->cores, s->threads, s->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ static void test_plug_with_device_add_x86(gconstpointer 
data)
     unsigned int s, c, t;
args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            td->machine, td->cpu_model,
                            td->sockets, td->cores, td->threads, td->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
- for (s = td->sockets; s < td->maxcpus / td->cores / td->threads; s++) {
+    for (s = 1; s < td->sockets; s++) {
         for (c = 0; c < td->cores; c++) {
             for (t = 0; t < td->threads; t++) {
                 char *id = g_strdup_printf("id-%i-%i-%i", s, c, t);
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void test_plug_with_device_add_coreid(gconstpointer 
data)
                            td->sockets, td->cores, td->threads, td->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
- for (c = td->cores; c < td->maxcpus / td->sockets / td->threads; c++) {
+    for (c = 1; c < td->cores; c++) {
         char *id = g_strdup_printf("id-%i", c);
         qtest_qmp_device_add(td->device_model, id, "{'core-id':%u}", c);
         g_free(id);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void add_pc_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 1;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 2;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
     if (g_str_has_suffix(mname, "-1.4") ||
         (strcmp(mname, "pc-1.3") == 0) ||
         (strcmp(mname, "pc-1.2") == 0) ||
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void add_pseries_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 2;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 1;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
path = g_strdup_printf("cpu-plug/%s/device-add/%ux%ux%u&maxcpus=%u",
                            mname, data->sockets, data->cores,
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void add_s390x_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 1;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 1;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
data2 = g_memdup(data, sizeof(PlugTestData));
     data2->machine = g_strdup(data->machine);




This patch with Igor Signed-off-by:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]