qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add Alistair as a RISC-V Maintainer


From: Palmer Dabbelt
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add Alistair as a RISC-V Maintainer
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:14:47 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:48:30 PDT (-0700), address@hidden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<address@hidden> wrote:

On 29/10/18 17:16, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Alistair has been contributing to the RISC-V QEMU port for a while now
> so I'd like him to be officially listed as a maintainer.  I've checked
> with the other RISC-V mainatiners and there are no objectics, and I've

"maintainers" "objections"

> also checked with Alistair so he knows I'm volunteering him.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden>

FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>

I can send a pull request with this patch (and the other RISC-V
patch). I'll fix the typos in the PR.

I don't think we have anything ready to go right now: your PCIe patches still have some outstanding feedback (on interrupt stuff), and Bastian's decodetree stuff has some patches from Richard Henderson that should be merged in. I was hoping to get through reviewing Michael's patches to fix the FS dirty bit, but haven't had time yet -- they're tested, but I haven't actually read through them.

Maybe we should get a RISC-V QEMU mailing list so we can keep everyone in sync without spamming the whole world?


Alistair


> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d794bd7a66fe..d550fd8b809c 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ F: disas/ppc.c
>   RISC-V
>   M: Michael Clark <address@hidden>
>   M: Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden>
> +M: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
>   M: Sagar Karandikar <address@hidden>
>   M: Bastian Koppelmann <address@hidden>
>   S: Maintained
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]