qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 05/33] virtio-blk: fix comment for virtio_blk_rw_


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 05/33] virtio-blk: fix comment for virtio_blk_rw_complete
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 22:44:01 -0500

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:17:03AM +0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/06/2018 02:15 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > From: Yaowei Bai <address@hidden>
> > 
> > Here should be submit_requests, there is no submit_merged_requests
> > function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > index 225fe44b7a..83cf5c01f9 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static void virtio_blk_rw_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
> >  
> >          if (req->qiov.nalloc != -1) {
> >              /* If nalloc is != 1 req->qiov is a local copy of the original
> 
> Should it be "If nalloc is != -1" in the comment? Seems the initial state is 
> -1.

Makes sense. Patch?

> > -             * external iovec. It was allocated in submit_merged_requests
> > -             * to be able to merge requests. */
> > +             * external iovec. It was allocated in submit_requests to be
> > +             * able to merge requests. */
> >              qemu_iovec_destroy(&req->qiov);
> >          }
> >  
> > 
> 
> Dongli Zhang



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]