[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/16] gdbstub: add multiprocess support to '
From: |
Luc Michel |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/16] gdbstub: add multiprocess support to '?' packets |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:27:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1 |
On 11/25/18 10:22 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Luc,
>
> On 23/11/18 10:17, Luc Michel wrote:
>> The gdb_get_cpu_pid() function does the PID lookup for the given CPU. It
>> checks if the CPU is a direct child of a CPU cluster. If it is, the
>> returned PID is the cluster ID plus one (cluster IDs start at 0, GDB
>> PIDs at 1). When the CPU is not a child of such a container, the PID of
>> the first process is returned.
>>
>> The gdb_fmt_thread_id() function generates the string to be used to identify
>> a given thread, in a response packet for the peer. This function
>> supports generating thread IDs when multiprocess mode is enabled (in the
>> form `p<pid>.<tid>').
>>
>> Use them in the reply to a '?' request.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <address@hidden>
>> Acked-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> gdbstub.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
>> index 26f5a7449a..4fbc05dfe3 100644
>> --- a/gdbstub.c
>> +++ b/gdbstub.c
>> @@ -638,10 +638,52 @@ static int memtox(char *buf, const char *mem, int len)
>> }
>> }
>> return p - buf;
>> }
>>
>> +static uint32_t gdb_get_cpu_pid(const GDBState *s, CPUState *cpu)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> + gchar *path, *name;
>
> Setting ...
>
> gchar *path, *name = NULL;
>
>> + Object *obj;
>> + CPUClusterState *cluster;
>> + uint32_t ret;
>> +
>> + path = object_get_canonical_path(OBJECT(cpu));
>> + name = object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(cpu));
>
> ... we might move this line ...
>
>> +
>> + if (path == NULL) {
>> + ret = s->processes[0].pid;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> ... hereOK I'll change that.
>
> name = object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(cpu));
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Retrieve the CPU parent path by removing the last '/' and the CPU
>> name
>> + * from the CPU canonical path. */
>> + path[strlen(path) - strlen(name) - 1] = '\0';
>
> Can we get there with path != NULL && name == NULL?
I think the only way we could end up in this case is if cpu ==
object_get_root(), which does not make much sense. I can add an
assert(name != NULL) here to enforce that.
>
>> +
>> + obj = object_resolve_path_type(path, TYPE_CPU_CLUSTER, NULL);
>> +
>> + if (obj == NULL) {
>> + ret = s->processes[0].pid;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cluster = CPU_CLUSTER(obj);
>> + ret = cluster->cluster_id + 1;
>> +
>> +out:
>> + g_free(name);
>> + g_free(path);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +#else
>
> [*]
>
>> + return s->processes[0].pid;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> static const char *get_feature_xml(const char *p, const char **newp,
>> CPUClass *cc)
>> {
>> size_t len;
>> int i;
>> @@ -907,10 +949,23 @@ static CPUState *find_cpu(uint32_t thread_id)
>> }
>>
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static char *gdb_fmt_thread_id(const GDBState *s, CPUState *cpu,
>> + char *buf, size_t buf_size)
>> +{
>> + if (s->multiprocess) {
>> + snprintf(buf, buf_size, "p%02x.%02x",
>> + gdb_get_cpu_pid(s, cpu), cpu_gdb_index(cpu));
>> + } else {
>> + snprintf(buf, buf_size, "%02x", cpu_gdb_index(cpu));
>> + }
>> +
>> + return buf;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int is_query_packet(const char *p, const char *query, char separator)
>> {
>> unsigned int query_len = strlen(query);
>>
>> return strncmp(p, query, query_len) == 0 &&
>> @@ -1018,22 +1073,23 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char
>> *line_buf)
>> const char *p;
>> uint32_t thread;
>> int ch, reg_size, type, res;
>> uint8_t mem_buf[MAX_PACKET_LENGTH];
>> char buf[sizeof(mem_buf) + 1 /* trailing NUL */];
>> + char thread_id[16];
>> uint8_t *registers;
>> target_ulong addr, len;
>>
>> trace_gdbstub_io_command(line_buf);
>>
>> p = line_buf;
>> ch = *p++;
>> switch(ch) {
>> case '?':
>> /* TODO: Make this return the correct value for user-mode. */
>
> Is this comment still relevant?
>
> If so, wouldn't it be better placed in [*]?
git blame shows that at the time when this comment was added
(1fddef4b1ba from 2005), the Stop Reply packet was like this:
+ /* TODO: Make this return the correct value for user-mode. */
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "S%02x", SIGTRAP);
Which is the form that contains only a signal number. So this comment
must refer to this hard-coded signal, so I think it is still valid :-)
However, you are right pointing out that the PID used in user-mode
should probably be the one of the QEMU process running the guest binary
(as it is done for TIDs I believe). I'll add a comment at [*] to point
that out.
Thanks.
--
Luc
>
>> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "T%02xthread:%02x;", GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP,
>> - cpu_gdb_index(s->c_cpu));
>> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "T%02xthread:%s;", GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP,
>> + gdb_fmt_thread_id(s, s->c_cpu, thread_id,
>> sizeof(thread_id)));
>> put_packet(s, buf);
>> /* Remove all the breakpoints when this query is issued,
>> * because gdb is doing and initial connect and the state
>> * should be cleaned up.
>> */
>>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/16] gdbstub: add multiprocess support to '?' packets,
Luc Michel <=