[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] hostmem-memfd: disable for systems wihto
From: |
Ilya Maximets |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] hostmem-memfd: disable for systems wihtout sealing support |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:46:39 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
On 16.01.2019 18:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:49:36AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:09:11PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 11.12.2018 13:53, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's restrict memfd backend to systems with sealing support.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we need todo that - sealing is optional in the QEMU code,
>>>> we simply have it set to the wrong default when sealing is not available.
>>>
>>> That was literally what I've fixed in v1:
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05483.html
>>>
>>> but 2 people suggested me to disable memfd entirely for this case.
>>> Do you think I need to get patch from v1 back ?
>>>
>>> Gerd, Marc-André, what do you think?
>>
>> I still think it makes sense to require sealing support. Sealing is
>> very useful, and there are only a few kernel versions with memfd but
>> without sealing. So finding such kernels in the wild will become more
>> rare over time. I wouldn't worry too much about them.
>
> -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=2M,seal=off still
> works on those systems, doesn't it? What's the rationale for
> breaking a working configuration without following the
> deprecation policy?
>
See the commit message.
'.seal' property is not registered if sealing is not supported.
So, there is no way to disable sealing on the system that does not support it.