qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hw/block/xen: use proper format str


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hw/block/xen: use proper format string for printing sectors
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:21:10 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.1.91

Andrew Cooper <address@hidden> writes:

> On 16/01/2019 12:13, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> The %lu format string is different depending on the host architecture
>> which causes builds like the debian-armhf-cross build to fail. Use the
>> correct PRi64 format string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/block/xen-block.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/xen-block.c b/hw/block/xen-block.c
>> index be28b63442..a636487b3e 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/xen-block.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/xen-block.c
>> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static void xen_block_realize(XenDevice *xendev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>
>>      xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "sector-size", "%u",
>>                                conf->logical_block_size);
>> -    xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "sectors", "%lu",
>> +    xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "sectors", "%"PRIi64,
>
> PRIu64.
>
> You've changed the signed-ness of what gets printed.

I was deliberate as:
  int64_t blk_getlength(BlockBackend *blk);

although I have to admit a signed block length doesn't make much sense
to me. At least it isn't going to overflow and will show-up if the block
length is ever negative.

>
> ~Andrew


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]