[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] s390x/pci: Introduce unplug requests and
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] s390x/pci: Introduce unplug requests and split unplug handler |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:08:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1 |
On 23.01.19 12:03, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:42:48 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> PCI on s390x is really weird and how it was modeled in QEMU might not have
>> been the right choice. Anyhow, right now it is the case that:
>> - Hotplugging a PCI device will silently create a zPCI device
>> (if none is provided)
>> - Hotunplugging a zPCI device will unplug the PCI device (if any)
>> - Hotunplugging a PCI device will unplug also the zPCI device
>> As far as I can see, we can no longer change this behavior. But we
>> should fix it.
>>
>> Both device types are handled via a single hotplug handler call. This
>> is problematic for various reasons:
>> 1. Unplugging via the zPCI device allows to unplug PCI bridges as
>> checks are not performed - bad.
>
> Maybe I'm confused here, but how can a zPCI device couple with a bridge?
>
I was confused, bridges don't attach to a zPCI device. So this remark is
invalid. Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 1/2] s390x/pci: Introduce unplug requests and split unplug handler, Collin Walling, 2019/01/30
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] s390x/pci: Unplug remaining devices on pcihost reset, David Hildenbrand, 2019/01/21