[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136
From: |
Alberto Garcia |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136 |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:34:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) |
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 11:11:06 AM CET, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed 23 Jan 2019 06:00:49 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by running:
>
> That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite easily now (I haven't
> tested the other one yet), but I don't think this happened
> earlier. I'll try to figure out what's going on.
I bisected this and it seems that 093 started to fail after this:
8258292e monitor: Remove "x-oob", offer capability "oob" unconditionally
I'm not familiar with that option so I need to investigate.
Berto
- [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Max Reitz, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Alberto Garcia, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136,
Alberto Garcia <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Eric Blake, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Alberto Garcia, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Markus Armbruster, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Alberto Garcia, 2019/01/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Consistency of iotests 093 and 136, Markus Armbruster, 2019/01/29